bch@unc.UUCP (08/13/83)
>>Lew Mammel re Steven J. Brams "Superior Beings...": >>* "Brams concerns himself exclusively with Old Testament *myths*, but clearly >>* his approach is just as applicable ... to *myths* in the New Testament..." >>I don't know if "myths" is Mammel's or Brams's, but it obviously indicates a >>philosophical presupposition. Unacceptable. Pardon me for being very dimwitted, but why are Brams' or Lew's philo- sophical presuppositions any more or less acceptable than yours? I realize that some people who contribute to this newsgroup have a direct line to the Truth. The problem is, I can't distinguish those who do from those who are mistaken. I would greatly appreciate some clarification. Thanks in advance, Byron Howes UNC - Chapel Hill