garys@bunkerb.UUCP (Gary Samuelson) (11/18/83)
Repsonses to Rich Rosen's responses to my responses to his questions: RR: My own feeling is that it is great to ask other people (living entities) for advice and help. When one "asks god" or "prays to god", since I obviously have doubts about the existence of a god, I feel that this is merely introspection. Again, it works for some people if they believe it is god, when in reality it is their own introspection. I would certainly not suggest that anyone who doesn't believe in a god ought to pray to one. I think I would be insulted if you were to tell me in the middle of a conversation that I wasn't there. (Note that I am not claiming to know how God would react to such an action). If you assume that there is no god, then the conclusion that prayer is really introspection is logical. But I thought that the question we were trying to deal with is whether or not that assumption is correct. --------------------------------------- RR: If the Lord helps those who help themselves, isn't prayer just a methodology for getting yourself in the frame of mind to help yourself? GMS: The statement that the Lord helps those who help themselves is not biblical, as far as I know. It is often used as a copout as to why someone should not be obligated to help another. RR: Agreed. I think the statement is indeed biblical, though, and is a perfect example of quoting the bible to suit one's needs. Why do you think that the statement is biblical? What passages have you read to substantiate that belief? Or do you think it is biblical just because you have heard it repeated so often by people who should know? That happens frequently; someone expounds an idea which sounds good (to that person) and it gets repeated so often that people finally assume it's biblical, when in fact it is not. Or is this simply a perfect example of misquoting the bible to suit one's needs? ------------------------------------------------------------- GMS: If a person believes that there is really a god out there listening to prayers, and that that god is able and willing to guide us in some way, then prayer is more than a method of altering one's frame of mind. Prayer does in fact alter one's frame of mind, but it does more. What you seem to call prayer I would call 'meditation' or 'contemplation'. How God answers prayer is another subject about which volumes have been written. RLR: Your paragraph assumes the existence of the god in question, which is of course where we differ. My opinions on the non-existence of god have already been put forth and explained. Your opinion of prayer follows logically from your opinions on the non-existence of god. But you seemed to be reversing the argument; i.e., you seemed to be saying that since prayer is really introspection, there is no god. ----------------------------------------------------------- RLR: If god existed, why would I be obliged to understand myself in relation to it? Do you (or I) establish understanding about our relationships to every single thing in the universe? You constantly assume that god must hold some special position of authority (specifically over you and all other people). Why? This is YOUR assumption (desire?) about the nature of god (not necessarily his :-). Think about it. Why does god have to be the way you picture it? Where have you seen evidence that shows this? You claim that even if there were a god, you would have no interest in learning about him? (her?) (it?) If you found out that there was another form of sapient life, wouldn't you want to learn about it? If you found out that there was a non-physical form of life, wouldn't you want to learn about it? It seems clear that your lack of interest in god is based on your ASSUMPTION that there isn't one. As for a special position of authority, God holds that by reason of being Creator. Wouldn't that give him some sort of special position? ------------------------------------------------------------ RLR: Only the god you choose to believe in is perfect. Human beings are not. (Is this another reason that you feel that there must be a god?) True, true, and that may be a factor. I'm not sure. I'm willing to admit that I have both rational and non-rational reasons for believing in God. Will you make a similar admission? ----------------------------------------------------------- RLR: Experiments like democracy are the ways that people try to establish their own guidelines and rights without external imposition. It sounds like a good idea; where can I find a democracy to see how it works? ------------------------------------------------------------ RLR: To believe the bible as the ultimate arbiter of people's rights is to impose your arbitrary standards on everyone. Why? I suppose an arbiter is by definition arbitrary :-). Seriously, I'm not sure I do believe the bible is an arbiter of people's rights. The bible doesn't say much about rights (which deals with how others should treat me); it says a lot about responsibilities (which deals with how I should treat others). As has been said before (and I don't want to start up another copy of that argument), "imposing standards" is what society and law are all about. All laws impose standards; the question is (or should be), Are the standards right, or appropriate, or practical, or effective, etc. To say, "You are trying to impose your standards," only means that you and I don't advocate the same standards. (Note that I do not admit that they are "my standards;" by which I mean I didn't invent them.) Gary Samuelson