[net.religion] Translations Old vs. Middle vs. Modern English

riddle@ut-sally.UUCP (01/20/84)

I'm just nitpicking, but:

 >> I happen to like the Canterbury Tales, in Old English...
 >>				-- David Norris
 >>				-- uw-beaver!ssc-vax!david

Chaucer's "Caunterbury Tales" were written in Middle English.  The main
example of Old English with which you may be familiar is "Beowulf".
There is a  l a r g e  difference between the two -- Middle English is
sufficiently distant from Modern English that it can be called a
different language, but sufficiently close that a modern reader can
bull his way through it with the help of footnotes and a lot of
guesswork.  Old English is much more distant, resembling Latin and
other archaic European languages in its grammar more closely than it
resembles the English of today, and unfamiliar enough that reading it
requires serious study.

And to relate this to the discussion at hand:  Shakespeare, King James'
Bible, and almost every other sample of archaic English most of you are
likely to have experience with are all classified as varieties of Modern
English.
----
Prentiss Riddle
("Aprendiz de todo, maestro de nada.")
{ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!riddle