[net.religion] id AA20452; Thu, 16 Feb 84 05:27:41 pst

lipman@decwrl.UUCP (02/16/84)

Message-Id: <8402161327.AA20452@decwrl.uucp>
Date: Thursday, 16 Feb 1984 05:31:39-PST
From: vax4::sander
To: net.religion
Subject: Speaking in tongues

Speaking in tongues is the least gift of the Holy Spirit.  It is 
given to us to help us praise God more perfectly.  Man tends to 
drift in thought when trying to praise God.  While talking in 
tongues the Spirit is doing the praying through us.  It is a gift 
for the individual to bring him/her closer to God.

Speaking in tongues does not mean that you 'will' be speaking in 
some foreign, unforgotten language; it is usually gibberish.  If 
we go back to Pentecost when the Holy Spirit came down upon those 
gathered in the room, and they "began speaking in languages they 
didn't know." (Acts 1:4).  This speaking in languages does not 
mean that it was any known language, present or past.  At the 
Pentecost there was also another working of the Holy Spirit, and 
that was interpreting the tongues.  As one apostle would address 
the crowds, everyone could understand him.  "And yet we hear them 
speaking all the native languages of the lands where we were 
born...and we all hear these men telling in our own languages 
about the mighty miracles of God!" (Acts 2:8,11).

A shortened story: a friend of mine was in church praying lowly 
in tongues.  As far as he knew from sound, his voice was 
producing gibberish.  After the service the lady that was sitting 
next to him said something like, "I didn't know you said your 
prayers in French."  The gentleman doesn't speak French, but the 
lady does.

So, speaking in tongues is a more perfect way of praising God, 
and was common in the early days of the church.  It does not 
guarantee that you will be speaking in some long-forgotten 
language.

Joe

rrizzo@bbncca.ARPA (Ron Rizzo) (02/17/84)

So speaking in tongues ("glossolalia") is gibberish , but it's still
holy!  What a demotion of religion that is!

The little I've heard about studies of the phenomenon revealed that every
case studied, which is apparently quite a few, showed linguistically
rather trivial things going on: simple changes in one or more phonolo-
gical rules of standard English managed to produce the streams of ap-
parent gibberish.  & if that didn't suffice to make it sound exotic,
speeding up or rhythmically inflecting the delivery did.

Well, is any suitably bizarre behavior worshipful, profound, pious?
Psychotic episodes?  General zaniness?
---

"Why, my ancestors fed people like you to big kitties!"

					Cheers,
					Ron Rizzo