pellegri@ittral.UUCP (Dan Pellegrino) (02/22/84)
>From ittvax!decvax!dartvax!dalcs!y4101 Mon Feb 20 04:12:18 1984
Received: by decvax.UUCP (4.12/4.13)
id AA01119; Mon, 20 Feb 84 02:29:46 est
Received: by dartvax.UUCP (4.12/4.7)
id AA21635; Mon, 20 Feb 84 00:12:09 est
Received: by dalcs.UUCP (4.12/4.7)
id AA07021; Sun, 19 Feb 84 17:18:56 ast
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 84 17:18:56 ast
From: decvax!dartvax!dalcs!y4101 (Marcus Aurellius)
Message-Id: <8402192118.AA07021@dalcs.UUCP>
To: dartvax!decvax!ittvax!ittral!pellegri
Subject: Re: An alternative to net.religion subgroups
References: <366@ittral.UUCP>
YES! I am not religious and occasionally get into spirited (sic)
discussions on the subject but I honestly cannot see any reason for
spilling such discussions into "net.religion". I assumed the a group
called "net.religion" is for people who are religious and like to
share ideas about it. To use that forum to flame religion is very
revolting to me.
If I want to start a crusade to elliminate religion I'll do it on
my own turf, thank you. I won't add my comments to the splitting
up of subgroups debate since I am a newcommer (this is my first
article in fact) and I am sure I am not familiar enough with the
mechanisms in place. However, if there is anyone out there that
can enlighten me on net protocols and tips (or at least direct
me to an appropriate article) I would greatly appreciate it (I hate
comming in to something new and having to fumble around until
I get it right).
Marcus Aurellius
aka Marc J. Trottier
Dalhousie University
Nova Scotia, Canadapellegri@ittral.UUCP (Dan Pellegrino) (02/22/84)
The following article was mailed to me and is being forwarded to the net at
the request of the author, Marcus Aurellius.
The path to Marcus Aurellius is decvax!dartvax!dalcs!y4101
>From ittvax!decvax!dartvax!dalcs!y4101 Mon Feb 20 04:12:18 1984
Received: by decvax.UUCP (4.12/4.13)
id AA01119; Mon, 20 Feb 84 02:29:46 est
Received: by dartvax.UUCP (4.12/4.7)
id AA21635; Mon, 20 Feb 84 00:12:09 est
Received: by dalcs.UUCP (4.12/4.7)
id AA07021; Sun, 19 Feb 84 17:18:56 ast
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 84 17:18:56 ast
From: decvax!dartvax!dalcs!y4101 (Marcus Aurellius)
Message-Id: <8402192118.AA07021@dalcs.UUCP>
To: dartvax!decvax!ittvax!ittral!pellegri
Subject: Re: An alternative to net.religion subgroups
References: <366@ittral.UUCP>
YES! I am not religious and occasionally get into spirited (sic)
discussions on the subject but I honestly cannot see any reason for
spilling such discussions into "net.religion". I assumed the a group
called "net.religion" is for people who are religious and like to
share ideas about it. To use that forum to flame religion is very
revolting to me.
If I want to start a crusade to elliminate religion I'll do it on
my own turf, thank you. I won't add my comments to the splitting
up of subgroups debate since I am a newcommer (this is my first
article in fact) and I am sure I am not familiar enough with the
mechanisms in place. However, if there is anyone out there that
can enlighten me on net protocols and tips (or at least direct
me to an appropriate article) I would greatly appreciate it (I hate
comming in to something new and having to fumble around until
I get it right).
Marcus Aurellius
aka Marc J. Trottier
Dalhousie University
Nova Scotia, Canada