[net.religion] In helping Larry & David overcome logical myopia

rlr@pyuxn.UUCP (Rich Rosen) (02/21/84)

If the Book of Ubizmo is a book claiming that Ubizmo is the supreme god,
and if that book contains passages showing Ubizmo engaging in heinous,
disgusting acts of violence and violation to horrific to describe in a
family newsgroup, then I have options as follows:

	1) To believe in the Book of Ubizmo, and therefore to believe that
		Ubizmo did indeed do all of those things described therein

	2) NOT to believe in the validity of the Book of Ubizmo, and NOT to
		believe that anything contained in it necessarily describes
		the truth

	3) Not to care.

Option (1) has one of (at least) two consequences.  Either you can do what
Tim, myself, and others have done:  say that if the Book of Ubizmo is true,
then (by definition) Ubizmo DID all of the terrible things in it, and,
by our judgment as thinking beings, then Ubizmo is a terrible entity.  Or
you can do what David, Larry, and other Christians (apparently) do: say that
if the Book of Ubizmo is true, then (by definition) Ubizmo DID all of the
terrible things in it, but that since we are not equipped to understand the
real meaning of Ubizmo's acts, we will believe anyway, since Ubizmo has
done wonderful things in our lives like giving us Cuisinarts and electric
snowshoes.

Even if I did believe (option 1) that the content of the Book of Ubizmo is
gospel truth, I would (and apparently others would) make the choice to judge
Ubizmo based on the actions described in the Book.  If the supreme god of
the universe behaves like that, then it is not fit to be worshipped.  Of
course, others choose not to judge.  That is their decision.

The crux of the problem may be that Larry and David cannot envision a
supreme god that is different from the one described in the Bible, since
they hold it to be self-evident truth.  The proposition (that they keep
tearing down) is this:  if god were as abominable as it is depicted to be
in the Bible to be, then I could choose not to worship it based on
my own judgment.  I can also choose not to believe that god is that way,
or not to believe that god exists at all.  Larry and David apparently do
not see these three choices as alternatives, and presumable WILL not.
And therein lies the problem.

-- 
Pardon me for breathing, which I never do anyway oh, god, I'm so depressed...
	Rich Rosen    pyuxn!rlr

tld@ssc-vax.UUCP (Thomas L Davis) (02/24/84)

The assumption is being made here that the Christian faith is
based on the acts of God as described in the Bible. This is not
correct. The Christian faith is not based on anything Jesus said,
or did, or taught. It is based on Who He was. God made Incarnate.
"Very God of Very God" in the words of the Nicene Creed.
Christian doctrtine is based on the works and teachings of Jesus
as they have been interpreted by the Apostles, but our faith is
given to us by the Holy Spirit. It is He who convicts us of sin
and moves us to accept Jesus into our lives as Lord and Savior.
Not enough accept.

When we have received Jesus as our Lord and Savior, then the Holy
Spirit comes to dwell in us and begin making us fit to be the
Bride of the King. That process does not always move as fast as
some would like, but it does move.

The acts of God described in the Old Testament are not all that
different from those described in the Revelation to John.
Continued refusal and denial of God will be rewarded
appropriately. You can chose the reward - Eternal Life at the side
of Christ the King or the lake of fire and brimstone. It is up to
you.