[net.religion] Proselytizing on the net

wetcw@pyuxa.UUCP (T C Wheeler) (02/24/84)

Please, Mr. Davis, if you want to proselytize, go out and find a
nice street corner and set up shop.  As you will note from reading
the Articles in this news group, everyone has his or her opinion
regarding religion.  I have never seen an opinion changed or a stand
reversed because of the type of submission you have posted.  Most
of the arguments amount to "how many angels can sit on the head
of a pin?" type.

The discussions are interesting, with the different sides defending
their positions with great outpourings of deathless prose.  Just
be content to read them, but don't go telling anyone they are going
to roast in some mythical oven.  Many, and some quite religeous,
netters just do not believe that that scenario is true.
The arguments have been, if you wish to join in:
	a. God is dead
	b. God is mean and nasty
	c. God is good
	d. There is no god
	e. Who needs god
	f. Morality has nothing to do with god
	g. God is everything
	h. God is an abstract whatever
	i. God is real
	j. My god is nicer than your god
	k. Religion is the opiate of the masses
	l. Gods I have never met

and so on.......

No one is telling anyone else that they are going to go to hell
in a handbasket if they don't believe the same way.  Save the
fire and brimestone for the street corner or tent meeting.  Jump
into the fray at any point, but remember, you ain't gonna change
any minds out there.  It is best to present what you believe then
stand back and be ready to defend your position from all sides.
It may sound sometimes as if people are attacking your beliefs.
It is most likely not so, they are just defending their own
positions.  We all have our hobbyhorses to ride.

T. C. Wheeler

gulley@stolaf.UUCP (William T. Gulley) (02/28/84)

       Sorry, T.C., but it looks like you're doing much the same
  to tdavis as you feel he's doing to you. . only on the opposite
  end of the fence.  Like it or not, proselytizing is, and always
  has been a part of not only religion, but Americanism, Communism,
  and anything else that evokes a sense of belief in a person.  If
  you don't believe something's good for someone else, how can you
  believe that it's good for you? (Unless, of course, you feel some-
  how we're not all intrinsically the same, and "truth" exists in
  tailor-made personal versions- a belief system I am well acquainted
  with)

        A lot of the talk here about religion is stimulating and rel-
  evant, with the vast majority approaching it from a largely intel-
  lectual standpoint. (Which is great- St. Augustine would love it)
  However, I for at least one, feel that Tom Davis's speaking from
  a highly subjective, highly UN-deteched viewpoint not only some-
  what refreshing from the intellectualism, ("You open your mind too
  much, and your brains will fall out") but serves to round out the
  content of this newsgroup by presenting the views of one who 
  speaks totally from "inside" a belief.  

	If his expressed views seem too simple and trusting to you,
  maybe it's only because he confidently attempts to give answers, 
  not just constantly more questions. Take them or leave them.

	Any committed Islamics or Zen Buddhists out there?
 ____

    Man, that felt great. . 

    William Gulley - St. Olaf College - Northfield, MN 55057
    . .!inhp4!stolaf!gulley
     

tld@ssc-vax.UUCP (Thomas L Davis) (03/04/84)

	Therefore, as it is written, "Let him who boasts, boast of
	the Lord." When I came to you, bretheren, I did not come
	proclaiming to you the testimony of God in lofty words or
	wisdom. For I decided to know nothing among you except
	Jesus Christ and him crucified. 1 Cor. 1:31-2:2 (RSV).

I have been accused of proselytizing on this net. I deny that most
vehemently. If anyone out there is a Methodist or Baptist or
Lutheran, it is not my intent to entice you into the the Episcopal
Church, and that is the meaning of proselytizing. What I have been
guilty of, and like Pres. Reagan I will wear this accusation like
a crown, is evangelizing, speading the Gospel, the "Good News."

There seem to be those on this net who wish only to engage in
"mental Onanism." They are free with critical comments, but not
willing to hear defense or apologies for a given point of view.
If this net is to be a free and meaningful exhange medium, then it
must be open to all varieties of expression. I find many of the
views expressed here to be distasteful and frequently obnoxious.
I try to respond in an orderly and civilized manner without
attacking the person, only the subject matter. When I err, or
waiver from this path, I expect correction. But I do not expect
vilification for the statement of deeply held religious
convictions.

There seem to be those here who are so insecure in their being,
that they feel they must apologize for their very existence, for
every breath that they take. To those I would say "God loves you,
even in your sin, regardless of your opinion of belief in Him."
No one needs to be ashamed or to be in fear of the Lord. "He loved
us, even when we were in sin."

And to Bill Culley, thanks for the nice words.

	Tom Davis
	uw-beaver!ssc-vax!tld