[net.religion] Gibbon on Christianity

flinn@seismo.UUCP (E. A. Flinn) (03/16/84)

---

Some of the comments on christianity made by Edward Gibbon a couple of
months before the Battle of Lexington are still relevant, and may be
of interest to people who read this group.  The following are
extracted from chapters 15 and 16 of the Decline and Fall.  Those who
aren't familiar with Gibbon should realize that in these chapters he
is often savagely ironic, and if he had been writing on computer
terminals might have used lots of :-) signs.


	"Our curiosity is naturally prompted to inquire by what means
the Christian faith obtained so remarkable a victory over the
established religions of the earth.  To this inquiry an obvious but
satisfactory answer may be returned, that it was owing to the
convincing evidence of the doctrine itself and to the ruling
providence of its great Author.  But as truth and reason seldom find
so favourable a reception in the world, and as the wisdom of
Providence frequently condescends to use the passions of the human
heart and the general circumstances of mankind as instruments to
execute its purpose, we may still be permitted (though with becoming
submission) to ask, not indeed what were the first, but what were the
secondary causes of the rapid growth of the Christian church...

	"Acknowledging that the literal sense is repugnant to every
principle of faith as well as reason, [The Fathers of the Church] deem
themselves secure and invulnerable behind the ample veil of allegory,
which they carefully spread over every tender part of the Mosaic
dispensation...

	"We might naturally expect that a principle [immortality of the
soul] so essential to religion would have been revealed in the
clearest terms to the chosen people of Palestine and that it might
safely have been entrusted to the hereditary priesthood of Aaron.  It
is incumbent on us to adore the mysterious dispensations of
Providence, when we discover that the doctrine of the immortality of
the soul is omitted in the law of Moses; it is darkly insinuated by
the prophets; and during the long period which elapsed between the
Egyptian and the Babylonian servitudes the hopes as well as fears of
the Jews appear to have been confined within the narrow compass of the
present life...

	"Miraculous Powers of the Early Church.  The supernatural
gifts, which even in this life were ascribed to the Christians above
the rest of mankind, must have conduced to their own comfort, and very
frequently to the conviction of infidels.  Besides the occasional
prodigies, which might sometimes be effected by the immediate
interposition of the Deity when he suspended the laws of Nature for
the service of religion, the Christian church, from the time of the
apostles and their first disciples, has claimed an uninterrupted
succession of miraculous powers, the gift of tongues, of vision, and
of prophecy, the power of expelling demons, of healing the sick, and
of raising the dead.  The knowledge of foreign languages was
frequently communicated to the contemporaries of Irenaeus, though
Irenaeus himself was left to struggle with the difficulties of a
barbarous dialect whilst he preached the Gospel to the natives of
Gaul...

	... "In the days of Irenaeus, about the end of the second
century, the resurrection of the dead was very far from being
esteemed an uncommon event; that the miracle was frequently performed
on necessary occasions by great fasting and the joint supplication of
the church of the place; and that the persons thus restored to their
prayers had lived afterwards among them many years.  At such a period,
when faith could boast of so many wonderful victories over death, it
seems difficult to account for the skepticism of those philosophers
who still rejected and derided the doctrine of the resurrection.  A
noble Grecian had rested on this important ground the whole
controversy, and promised Theophilus, bishop of Antioch, that if he
could be gratified with the sight of a single person who had actually
been raised from the dead, he would immediately embrace the Christian
religion.  It is somewhat remarkable that the prelate of the first
eastern church, however anxious for the conversion of his friend,
thought proper to decline this fair and reasonable challenge...

	"It may seem somewhat remarkable that Bernard of Clairvaux, who
records so many miracles of his friend St. Malachi, never takes any
notice of his own, which in their turn, however, are carefully related
by his companions and disciples.  In the long series of ecclesiastical
history, does there exist a single instance of a saint asserting that
he himself possessed the gift of miracles?

	"Seneca, the elder and younger Pliny, Tacitus, Plutarch, Galen,
Epictetus, and the emperor Marcus Antoninus ... filled with glory
their respective stations ... Philosophy had purified their minds from
the prejudices of the popular superstition; and their days were spent
in the pursuit of truth and the practice of virtue.  Yet all these
sages (it is no less an object of surprise than concern) overlooked or
rejected the perfection of the christian system.  Their language or
their silence equally discover their contempt for the growing sect
which in their time had diffused itself over the Roman empire.  Those
among them who condescend to mention the Christians consider them only
as obstinate and perverse enthusiasts, who exacted an implicit
submission to their mysterious doctrines without being able to produce
a single argument that could engage the attention of men of sense and
learning...

	... "But how shall we excuse the supine inattention of the
pagan and philosophic world to those evidences which were presented by
the hand of Omnipotence not to their reason but to their senses?
During the age of Christ, of his apostles, and of their first
disciples, the doctrine which they preached was confirmed by
innumerable prodigies.  The lame walked, the blind saw, the sick were
healed, the dead were raised, demons were expelled, and the laws of
Nature were frequently suspended for the benefit of the church.  But
the sages of Greece and Rome turned aside from the awful spectacle
and, pursuing the ordinary occupations of life and study, appeared
unconscious of any alterations in the moral or physical government of
the world.  Under the reign of Tiberius the whole earth, or at least a
celebrated province of the Roman empire, was involved in a
preternatural darkness of three hours.  Even this miraculous event,
which ought to have excited the wonder, the curiousity, and the
devotion of mankind, passed without notice in an age of science and
history.  It happened during the lifetime of Seneca and the elder
Pliny, who must have experienced the immediate effects or received the
earliest intelligence of the prodigy.  Each of these philosophers, in
a laborious work, has recorded all the great phenomena of Nature,
earthquakes, meteors, comets, and eclipses, which his indefatigable
curiousity could collect.  Both the one and the other have omitted to
mention the greatest phenomenon to which the mortal eye has been
witness since the creation of the globe..."