[net.religion] Why live?

wildbill@ucbvax.UUCP (William J. Laubenheimer) (03/27/84)

>	And in the "leap of faith" discussion, there is one tremendous leap that
>	hasn't been mentioned yet: if there is nothing outside of this life -
>	why live? Why not just put everyone out of their misery? :-(
>	-- 
>					The Ice Floe of the Q-Bick
>					{ucbvax,ihnp4}!{decwrl,amd70}!qubix!lab
>					decwrl!qubix!lab@Berkeley.ARPA

I don't think this is right. As a matter of fact, I think it is completely
backwards. If there is nothing outside of this life, if death is in fact
The End, why die? Under this assumption, putting anyone (including one's
self) out of his ``misery'' must rank as the most heinous crime possible,
since this means that the person so treated has lost all opportunity to
make something of h{is,er} life, or to make the world a better place to
live in. After all, it's the only place we've got to live in.

My position on the existence of an afterlife is essentially that of
Robert A. Heinlein's alter ego, Lazarus Long -- I'm going to find
out eventually, so there's no point in worrying about it. In the
meantime, I will do what I can to improve the quality of life for everyone,
here and now. Life after death might be better, or it might be worse --
but I'm in absolutely no hurry to find out.

As long as we're on the subject of afterlives here, perhaps everyone gets
the afterlife they believe in -- the Buddhist gets reincarnated, the Moslem
goes to paradise, the Christian goes to wherever he believes a Christian
with his record would be headed, be it Heaven, Hell, Purgatory, or whatever,
the solipsist (among others) simply disappears. This seems like an
excellent way of reconciling all the various belief systems in the world.
Think about it!
                                        Bill Laubenheimer
----------------------------------------UC-Berkeley Computer Science
          ...Killjoy WAS here!          ucbvax!wildbill