[net.religion] Censorship: A Case History

karl@osu-dbs.UUCP (Karl Kleinpaste) (05/17/84)

I have just recently finished reading the entirety of Tim's assorted
mail correspondence in the "Censorship: A Case History" articles.  I
have a couple of things to say on the subject.

First, I fear greatly that I am at least partially responsible for Tim
having been evicted from the net.  At the time of his (then unexplained)
disappearance from the net, he, David Norris, myself, and a couple of
others had been debating several facets of the Egyptian plagues.  This
was all built out of the original comments from "Even if I DID Believe"
(or at least I think that's where it started).  During the course of
this particular debate, there had been many wild and non-understandable
departures from the discussion itself, generally leading off to the
all-too-common arena of personal attack.  The last article which I saw
from Tim on the subject was a response to myself and David Norris on
several particular points about Pharoah's free will and related topics.

Tim's article went along its logical way for a while, but it ended with
a paragraph which went something like [apologies for errors here, I am
working strictly from memory]: "I would like to thank David Norris and
Karl Kleinpaste for helping me to understand the Plagues of Egypt.  The
next edition of 'Even if I DID Believe...' will have a much longer and
far more condemnatory paragraph on the subject."  I, personally, consi-
dered this just plain too much; I wrote a response article, in which I
addressed Tim's points proper, followed by this quote, and pointed out
to any who would read it that such comments do not do one darn thing
for a logical discussion, and that they only demonstrate general into-
lerance.  I finished by saying that I felt the hate level in net.reli-
gion was awfully high, and could everybody please tone things down a
bit.

Well, I never saw another article from unc!tim again in net.religion.
It seems that it was at approximately this time that Tim was censored
from the net.  If my article, titled [I think] "Re: Plagues of Egypt...
and an objection to net.religion," was responsible for this bad series
of events, then I am truly and emphatically sorry.  Tim and I have made
the rounds on the net and in the mail a few times, but at the very least
he always made me think.  I missed his rather acerbic articles quite a
bit.  As I once said in response to someone's (Avi's?) survey, I used
to read Tim's articles just because they were infuriating.

Second, if it isn't already clear by what I've already said, I think
the administration at UNC computer science department overreacted.
I think a strongly-worded warning against being generally abusive on
the net would have been more than sufficient.  (Yes, I believe that
Tim was at times just plain abusive, which I don't like.  Tim probably
isn't going to like that opinion, but I can't change that.)  At least
then Tim would have had some outside force to convince him to tone
things down, and he would have been able to stay around.

Third, I don't know *anyone* who ever thought that Tim in any way
represented anyone whatsoever but himself.  The one comment by (I
think) Dr Brooks which dismayed me the most was something to the ef-
fect that it was not permissible for Tim to represent the UNC Comp.
Sci. Dept. to the world-at-large in such ways.  That, I feel, was way
off base.  Tim was never representing anyone else at all.  I think
everyone was aware of that.

Fourth, I think Tim vastly overestimates the degree to which the UNC
Comp. Sci. Dept. administration & faculty was influenced toward his
censorship by certain of its members' Christian views.  Consider this
fragment from part 4:
>(5) Given the Christian worldview, religious censorship is completely
>consistent with moral requirements, since souls could wind up damned if the
>censorship is not imposed.
Phooey and nonsense.  Censorship does not produce Christians; it pro-
duces p*****-off people.  I was upset with the attitudes which Tim put
forth at times, regardless of my religious beliefs.  I just don't like
to see personal attacks, which Tim *did* use at times.  His dept's ad-
ministration apparently didn't like it either, so they did something
about it.  Unfortunately, they did too much.

Well, I guess that's it.  Now I guess Tim is in Pittsburgh.  Does he
work for or go to school at C-MU or Pitt?  Tim, are you out there?
-- 
Karl Kleinpaste @ Bell Labs, Columbus	614/860-5107	{cbosgd,ihnp4}!cbrma!kk