gregbo@houxm.UUCP (Greg Skinner) (09/26/84)
From: rcd@opus.UUCP (Dick Dunn) >> Seriously though, Jeff has brought up a valid point. If he is married, then >> he doesn't need Playboy obviously. In general though, I think the point is >> that those Christians who are married have a distinct advantage that they can >> have sex with their SOs and not feel guilty. But what about us Christians >> who aren't married and have to keep our hormones on a leash? (me) > If Christianity vs hormones is a problem, I suggest that you look again to > your religion. It better have an answer for you, because the hormones are > there just as they should be, doing what they're supposed to do. I'll give > you one clue: "Ignore them" ain't a useful answer. Actually, I was only half serious when I posted this -- I should've included a half smile but I left it off just to see how this would have been interpreted. I am in pretty good command of my hormones (even though I can't keep them in /usr/gregbo/hormones). However, I sometimes feel (well, you know how one feels sometimes) and I know people who weren't married who felt that way, and now they don't because they are married, so I guess you know what I am talking about. (further discussion in private mail for whomever wishes) -- Hug me till you drug me, honey! Greg Skinner (gregbo) {allegra,cbosgd,harvard,ihnp4}!houxm!gregbo