acheng@uiucdcs.UUCP (10/26/84)
>/* Written 5:54 pm Oct 25, 1984 by hav@dual in uiucdcs:net.religion */ ><*munch*> > >Brunson, *you're* a sick man. And if you don't think you are a fascist, I >suggest you take another look at your dictionary. If that doesn't help (I >doubt it will), you are probably in the dire need of intensive psychiatric >help that I've always suspected. > >Helen Anne Vigneau >Dual Systems Corporation > >P.S. I'm sure the KKK would be proud to have yet another animal like you as > a member of their organization. >/* End of text from uiucdcs:net.religion */ I don't think gays are okay (hold your fire) but i don't agree with Brunson of using it as a hiring criteria. On the otherhand, Vigneau's message above was not a good taste debate/discussion. I have been following this gay-hiring series and i enjoyed the discussions/opinions. How about keeping the "mudslinging" out of this? Albert Cheng acheng%uiuc@csnet-relay.ARPA {ihnp4,pur-ee}!uiucdcs!acheng
acheng@uiucdcs.UUCP (10/29/84)
>/* Written 7:05 am Oct 28, 1984 by manis@ubc-visi in uiucdcs:net.religion */ >... >If David Brunson were in my data structures class, maybe I should fail >him even if he were an A student. After all, giving an anti-gay bigot >a university degree gives him a cachet of authority which anti-gay >bigots ought not to have. Hmm... >/* End of text from uiucdcs:net.religion */ If you were serious about this thought (impossible to execute), you would be doing exactly the same thing that you thought you should fail Brunson. He should be judged by his class work and nothing else. Furthermore, it is possible that if Brunson continues his education, he may run into some other students who will convince him to change his point while leaving college early *may* deprieve him of this chance. The bottom line is, "you can't tell about the future". Albert Cheng acheng%uiuc@csnet-relay.ARPA {ihnp4,pur-ee}!uiucdcs!acheng