[net.religion] response to ken nichols - the character of god

jtc78@ihuxm.UUCP (Mike Cherepov) (10/19/84)

I hate to grow moss on a clear issue, but why differ?...
( > - Ken Nichols)


>No, I meant exactly as I said.  I know I'm on the write path, but I can't show
>you why.  Why would you take my word for it (if I had factual evidence) if you 
>won't take God's word for it? ('it' = christianity)  Certainly God is much 
>greater than I.

You know that you right, Khomeini knows that he's right, clever
Zen people just know that they are right, Oziris' worshippers knew deep
inside that they were right. Nobody can explain how they knew it, and
the sad thing is that some of these folks' knowledge is but a myth.
Go tell them that it's they who are mistaken. Or tell me why trust
you. Your paragraph could have been written by a devil's servant and
would sound just as convincingly. 

>> He just can not fulfill his desire to commune, you know. Not unless
>> you give him a hand. 
>
>No, not unless you take the hand He's is extending toward you.  You just 
>except the provisions He's already made.  Confessing your sin would do nothing
>unless God forgave that sin because of Christ's sacrifice.  Nothing we do will
>help us to reach God, because He's already done it all.

It is irrelevant. You said "God can not"! 
The first time I heard that was while watching Mr. Angeley or one his
collegues (TV), and that made me choke on my quintuple scoth on the rocks.
How can you say "God can not"? This is ultimate confusion.

>Tim Maroney did a good job at proving how wise man thinks he is, when he is
>really a fool.  I know someone who will (literaly) dispose of him at the
>proper time, that's not my job.
>
>"...holding forth the                             Ken Nichols

Daddy, daddy, this bad boy called me a bad name!!
Don't count on the creator, Ken. 

  Instant Karma's gonna get you...
  				Mike Cherepov (aka Musing)

rjv@ihdev.UUCP (ron vaughn) (11/07/84)

.
i'm posting this for a friend.  please send all replies to the
net-address at the bottom.


I have been watching Ken Nichols say things that don't make sense now for
quite a while, but after seeing these quotes, I felt that I had to reply.

>                                                         Why can't you see
> it is because of God's perfect Holiness and Justice that He must condemn man
> for sin?  Why do you (everyone on the net) refuse to look at man's sin for
> what it is?  God cannot allow sin into His presence.  He has no choice in this
> matter.  His perfect attributes demand His judgement on sin.

This does not make sense.  God cannot allow sin in his presence??  I thought
he was everywhere!  Are you saying that God is not omnipotent?  Of course
there is sin in God's presence, because there is sin on this earth, and God
created this earth.  Furthermore, God had to have created sin.  If God did
not create sin, then where did it come from??  Are you willing to say that
there is another being with the power to do things against God's will???
If an inferior being (such as Satan, perhaps) created sin, then God in his
Holiness would then have to destroy the sin, according to you.  Of course if
he couldn't, then it would invalidate God's claim to omnipotence, and it
would become meaningless which diety you worshipped because they would
both be as powerful.  There are many other logical flaws in the argument that
god is opposed to sin.  I won't state them all now. I'll end with a quote-

"He who made kittens, put snakes in the grass"

> Holiness in opposed to sin.  They cannot co-habitate.

This is a very naive statement.  You must not have learned any of the
lessons that Eastern religions have taught us.  Good cannot exist without
evil.  The very term "good" has no meaning unless there also exists it
compliment "evil".  To destroy all evil is also to destroy all good, as
the definition of good would become meaningless without something to
compare it too.

Even if one does not believe in the oriental religions, there are still
valuable lessons to be learned which require a deepening of our understanding.
Simplified explanations of the battle between "good" and "evil", and ancient
Hebrew myths simply do not have much meaning in the modern world, with
the wealth of religious wisdom and knowledge we now have to draw upon.

I was once a Christian too, until I started studying religion.

"There is no god, and I am his prophet"

						Russell Spence
				replies to:	ihnp4!ihlpm!russ
						AT&T Technologies
						Naperville, IL

ken@qantel.UUCP (Ken Nichols@ex6193) (11/08/84)

> I have been watching Ken Nichols say things that don't make sense now for
> quite a while, but after seeing these quotes, I felt that I had to reply.
> 
>>                                                         Why can't you see
>> it is because of God's perfect Holiness and Justice that He must condemn man
>> for sin?  Why do you (everyone on the net) refuse to look at man's sin for
>> what it is? God cannot allow sin into His presence.  L%?has no choice in this
>> matter.  His perfect attributes demand His judgement on sin.
> 
> This does not make sense.  God cannot allow sin in his presence??  I thought
> he was everywhere!  Are you saying that God is not omnipotent?  Of course
> there is sin in God's presence, because there is sin on this earth, and God
> created this earth.  

I understand your argument.  I should have been more specific.  Of course God
sees sin in the world.  But He cannot fellowship with sin in an intimate way,
the way He desires to fellowship with man.

> Furthermore, God had to have created sin.  If God did
> not create sin, then where did it come from??  Are you willing to say that
> there is another being with the power to do things against God's will???
> If an inferior being (such as Satan, perhaps) created sin, then God in his
> Holiness would then have to destroy the sin, according to you.  Of course if
> he couldn't, then it would invalidate God's claim to omnipotence, and it
> would become meaningless which diety you worshipped because they would
> both be as powerful.  There are many other logical flaws in the argument that
> god is opposed to sin.  I won't state them all now. I'll end with a quote-
> 
> "He who made kittens, put snakes in the grass"

Satan was the originator of sin.  He introduced it to man in the Garden of Eden.
God can defeat sin.  Jesus Christ can already give us the victory over the
power of sin.  And in heaven we will be delivered from the presence of sin. 
God is letting sin run its course to destruction, and then He will come back
to claim the earth.

>> Holiness in opposed to sin.  They cannot co-habitate.
> 
> This is a very naive statement.  You must not have learned any of the
> lessons that Eastern religions have taught us.  Good cannot exist without
> evil.  The very term "good" has no meaning unless there also exists it
> compliment "evil".  To destroy all evil is also to destroy all good, as
> the definition of good would become meaningless without something to
> compare it too.

Good is good, and evil is evil.  God is perfect goodness.  And in Him there is
no evil.  God does exist in perfect goodness, and allways will.  Those Eastern
religions have taught you lies of the devil, not the truth about God.

> Even if one does not believe in the oriental religions, there are still
> valuable lessons to be learned which require a deepening of our understanding.
> Simplified explanations of the battle between "good" and "evil", and ancient
> Hebrew myths simply do not have much meaning in the modern world, with
> the wealth of religious wisdom and knowledge we now have to draw upon.

The gospel story is simple.  It's so simple that man has to try to make it 
perfectly logical in order to accept it.  It wasn't meant to be perfectly
logical.

> I was once a Christian too, until I started studying religion.
> 
> "There is no god, and I am his prophet"
> 
> 						Russell Spence

You may not have been a true Christian unless you accepted the gift of
salvation freely given on the cross.  Either you are still a Christian, but
are out of fellowship with God, or you never were a real Christian.  You cannot
unbecome a Christian.

If there is no God, what are you the prophet of?
--
"...holding forth the                          Ken Nichols
 word of life..." Phil. 2:16                   ...!ucbvax!dual!qantel!ken
--------------------

jnelson@trwrba.UUCP (John T. Nelson) (11/09/84)

	Furthermore, God had to have created sin.  If God did not
	create sin, then where did it come from??  Are you willing to
	say that there is another being with the power to do things
	against God's will???

Well actually one can say that God created the potential for ALL
things to happen... like setting up a particular basis for a particular
N-space, but not actually deriving all of the solutions then.
Uh... get what I mean?

This is a basic problem... why did God put evil in the world.


				- John