esk@wucs.UUCP (Paul V. Torek) (11/27/84)
[reply-to: brunson@usfbobo.UUCP (David Brunson)] I've had it. None of Brunson's opponents seem to want to give his question (the one he keeps repeating for the "N+1th" time) the answer it deserves. I can't let it be thought that their wishy-washy replies represent the only grounds of opposition to Brunson. Now listen carefully, Brunson. You are wrong. You should lose the case in your example. The reason is that your action harms, not helps, the homosexuals you discriminate against. It also harms society by giving a less-qualified person the job. See Brunson, none of this wishy-washy "you shouldn't impose your values" from me. It's not that imposing values is always and everywhere wrong; it's just that you're trying it with the wrong values. You warned your previous opponents that they should not be willing to give up arguing with you because that leaves the issue to political battle. I hope it does not come down to that, but if you think I'm scared: I laugh in your general direction. Pass the ammunition, and may the best idea win! --Scratching the ITCH TO OFFEND, The aspiring iconoclast, Paul V. Torek, ihnp4!wucs!wucec1!pvt1047 Please send any mail directly to this address, not the sender's.