[net.religion] the old and the new

david@cvl.UUCP (David Harwood) (12/13/84)

	I wanted to straighten out some things in my
quarrel with Yiri Ben-David.
	First, in my original, very obviously sarcastic
article, I used the expression "if you believe that
Y'shua was a good-old-boy, who was lynched in effigy
by the murderous Gentiles, well then, you simply do
not know your right hand from your left."
	In his reflexive "response" to this stimulus, Yiri 
seemed to interpret this to refer to the physical execution 
of Y'shua by the occupying Roman authorities (with a little
help from Caesar's friends). But of course I was not 
referring to this official assassination at all, any more 
than he had been before this.
	The expression was a figure for his own view, his
very own hobbyhorse, that the religious orthodoxy of "Y'shua" 
has been ideologically "lynched" (or "crucified" if you 
prefer) by early species of Gentile "Christians", whom he 
has often inclusively characterized as murderers.
	The consequent clause is also a figure -- of
Yiri's confusion -- of his purely imaginary notions about
"Y'shua", -- on the one hand, with the scholarly views of 
Parkes and Bagatti, and on the other hand, with his own 
anti-Christian (also anti-Torah) bigotry.
	I seem to recall that Jeff Gillette of Duke Divinity
School has already observed that, with exceptions, Yiri
has generally misrepresented the views of Parkes and
Bagatti. Also, Yiri has already quit his "debate" with Jeff, I
might add, with a tantrum. (Go ahead... repost his exchanges
with you!)
	There is absolute reason to believe that Y'shua was not
by any means an "orthodox" Jew among his contemporaries. On the
contrary, from the earliest Gospel of Mark and the even earlier
writings of Paul, it is clear that neither Y'shua, nor Paul,
did identify the Eternal Law with any tradition observed by mankind,
anymore than did any of the prophets. (Human "authorities" simply
do not get along with prophets -- they get rid of them.) Neither
is Jesus an "orthodox" Christian of any generation.
	Rather, they said of our traditions, that although they 
are somewhat providential, they are also corrupt and irrelevant.
By themselves, they will miss the eternal mark.
	In Mark, it is said by Jesus, "Isaiah was right when he
prophesied about you hypocrites; as it is written: 'These people
honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. They
worship me in vain; their teachings are but rules taught by men.'
You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to the
traditions of men."
	And in Matthew, it is said by him, "Do not think that I
have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to
abolish them but to fulfill them." But he is referring to the
Eternal Law, as in the Psalm, "For ever, O Lord, Thy word standeth
fast in heaven," as he makes clear, saying in the same place,
"For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of
the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not
enter the kingdom of heaven." Then he gives the new, surpassingly
difficult commandments of the "Sermon on the Mount", especially
those under the principle of overcoming evil by returning goodness
and mercy.
	In the displaced story of the adulteress, who was to have been
stoned to death according to the law, Jesus once again exposes the
the merciless hypocrisy of men, saying, "If any of you is without
sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her." Neither is she
condemned by him (that is, consigned to death), but she is told to
stop sinning. 
	Therefore it is fitting that, in this story, "Jesus bent
down and wrote on the ground with his finger," a surpassingly merciful
commandment, I would say, even as it is said that the Lord descended
upon Mount Sinai and gave "the two tablets of the Testimony, tablets 
of stone, written with the finger of God." 
	The point is that Jesus has obviously sown a new Word
in the Earth, and written them upon our very hard hearts as a 
witness to us of God's goodness and mercy. This is not simply some
observance of orthodoxy, whether some tradition or other may 
identify the two Testaments, the old and the new, or just the
one, with the two tablets of Testimony written by the finger of God,
or whether some professors may debate that the swords of the Lord are 
one, rather than now two.
	Besides this, Paul, the great apostle to the Gentiles,
quite probably the most profound religious ideologist of all
time, suggests that while our traditions may make us partly 
conscious of the Eternal Law, they are lacking in force to make 
us better men. All our traditions are incomparably less convincing 
of what is right than the surpassing example of the life of Christ.
	But the world is still in the dark, until the end of this 
generation, which has rejected Christ.
	For it is true that mankind have already killed untold
numbers of innocent in the name of so-called "Christianity"; this
religious bigotry and murder has been there on every side of us, 
since the time Cain slew Abel.
	But this is a perverse misrepresentation of the NT 
teaching of and about Jesus. It is true, as John says, that
Christ has come unto his own (the "Jews", now the "Christians")
but they would not receive him. It is also true that "the soldiers 
divided his garments among them and cast lots for his clothing." 
It is also true that Peter has cut off the ears of others, with
his sword, so that they can hardly hear. And it is true, of each
one of us, that "when they (the religious and political authorities)
seized Jesus, (each) fled naked, leaving his garment behind." In fact, 
if you substitute "Christian" everywhere for "Jew" in the NT writings, 
they are not one bit less true. 
	The Gospel is an eternal nuisance to all of this generation.
	In this sense, so-called "Christianity" is a counterfeit; 
but then so is every so-called religious tradition. For all have
fallen short of the glory of God. Nevertheless, as Jesus said,
while salvation "is impossible by men, everything is possible
for God." 
	So not all Gentile "Christians" are murderers, neither 
are they fools, as Yiri would have it, even if they do not understand
what they profess to believe. There is a remnant, like a thread
in the wick of a candle which casts a very gloomy light. For example,
I will say that the Quaker Friends are, indeed, the church of
Philadelphia, and the friends of Christ. (I am an infant of the
Catholic Church, who is familiar with the Society of Friends.)
	But it would be absolutely deathly dark if it were not 
for the light of Christ; we would quickly suffer self-extinction 
on this planet otherwise. (And we may still if we reject his
way of life.) I believe many greatly underestimate what is good 
in the ideological influence of Christianity in Earth's civil-
ization, just as they confuse it too much with the culturally hered-
itary violence and prejudice of human traditions and institutions,
which predated it by hundreds even thousands of years. "Christianity"
is not worse than other traditions; rather, it is more popular as a
hypocrisy, since it so psychologically compelling of our conscience 
and imagination.
	I would remind Yiri, that it is said by David the king before
all the leaders of Israel, "Hear me, my brethren, and my people;
as for me, it was in my heart to build a house of rest for the ark
of the covenant of the Lord, and for the footstool of our God; and
I had made ready for the building. But God said unto me: Thou shalt
not build a house for My name, because thou art a man of war, and
hast shed blood."
	And if the ark of the covenant of the Lord is to be 
the innermost place of our hearts, then we must first be sure 
that there is no violence in our hearts, so that our words and our 
actions may truly glorify the goodness and mercy of God. It is
Christ who has made our hearts acceptable to the Lord.
	It is said that mankind "hid themselves from presence of
the Lord God amongst the trees of the garden," as if among our
human traditions. And "the Lord God called unto the mankind, and
said, "Where art thou?"
	But the Lord "has sent forth the lightnings," that even we
who were lost "may say unto Him: 'Here are we'." Therefore, it is
truly said that Christ "is the light of the world."

					David Harwood