[net.religion] And furthermore . . . to Ken Wolman

arndt@lymph.DEC (12/17/84)

You say, "Allowing the works of others to do his arguing for him . . ."
objecting to my use of quotes in a line of argument.  Then you seem to support
the "preserving [of] the moral vitality of what remains of the Judaeo-Christian
ethic".

My question:  What is wrong with using quotes from people who make sense in
ANY topic of argument???  Does that mean that I now cannot quote YOU???

Rich Rosen made the same objection.  It's pure merde!  I'm not shy about quoting
someone else if I think they have made a clear statement that bears on the topic.  Why should you be?  

Can't you refer to the Judaeo-Christian writings and tradition in defense of it?

I think you have both feet in your mouth on everything you said.  So there.

Go back to sleep.  Better yet wake up!

Keep chargin'

Ken Arndt

ktw@whuxi.UUCP (WOLMAN) (12/19/84)

Gee, it's wonderful to feel wanted!  I've made it!  My first
hate mail from Ken Arndt!  In the words of Eastwood and Reagan,
"Make my day!"  Indeed.

K. G. Arndt, you're a beautiful person.  The milk of human 
kindness flows through your veins.  Why don't you refrigerate
it before it stinks even more than it does now?

In fellowship,

Ken Wolman
whuxi!ktw