arndt@lymph.DEC (02/27/85)
You guys. Pickin' on Charley Wingate. Nitpicken' I should say. Your complaint about his "followup-to" line was very funny. Rather like the specticle of Sen.Metzenbaum's treatment of Meese and what's her name before the Senete Ethics Club. The guy who was cleared was grilled and the doll who was caught good and proper (her being a lawyer and a Congressperson for years - saying "Gee, I didn't know I was supposed to report . . . ") was apololigized to for having to answer questions. You claim Charley is trying to hide what he's saying - stupid on the face of it - and then YOU two, Rich especially, hide your stuff in LENGTH!!! The stuff of comics if I ever saw it. At least your complaint was short enough to read. It's only saving grace. How did you two ever see eye to eye on an issue??? I mean Rich is Mr. Materialism and Tim floats all kinds of mystical crap - I love his signature lines! Regards, k (Keep chargin' Charley!)
rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Professor Wagstaff) (02/28/85)
> You guys. Pickin' on Charley Wingate. Nitpicken' I should say. Are you calling Wingate a nit? > Your complaint about his "followup-to" line was very funny. > Rather like the specticle of Sen.Metzenbaum's treatment of Meese and > what's her name before the Senete Ethics Club. The guy who was cleared was > grilled and the doll who was caught good and proper (her being a lawyer and > a Congressperson for years - saying "Gee, I didn't know I was supposed to > report . . . ") was apololigized to for having to answer questions. I don't know what relevance this is supposed to have. Your AI project article submitter module is pulling references from the wrong places again. > You claim Charley is trying to hide what he's saying - stupid on the face > of it Not at all. You'll notice that Wingate seems to have terminated the action without so much as an acknowledgment or an apology. What say? > - and then YOU two, Rich especially, hide your stuff in LENGTH!!! You should be so lucky, Ken, as to be able to hide your stuff in LENGTH. I think you're thinking of Samuelson, no? > How did you two ever see eye to eye on an issue??? I mean Rich is > Mr. Materialism and Tim floats all kinds of mystical crap - I love his > signature lines! We disagree on many things, I've found. But we have enough of a basis as rational human beings to be able to communicate even though we disagree. Something that's certainly not true of some people... -- Otology recapitulates phonology. Rich Rosen ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr