hua@cmu-cs-gandalf.ARPA (Ernest Hua) (03/04/85)
___________________________________________________________________________ > { from: Marchionni V6M@PSUVM.BITNET } > > The idea of two "planes" is difficult since what is usually meant is NOT > the math concept of two parallel entities. It MIGHT be more useful to think > of subset vs set images. > > Let us say that we exist in the natural. Okay, so far ... > Angels live in the supernatural but visit the natural. (Guardian angels) Say what ?! > God is everwhere both natural and supernatural. Huh?! How did you managed to get from the first step to the second and to the third? Very interesting and bold assertions that you bring up! Are you ever going to substantiate them, or are you just going to sit back and keep cranking them out? First, what do you mean by "supernatural"? I would assume "beyond nature". Now, would you please prove that such an animal exists?! I bet you can't! I am just going to stop commenting here because your assumptions and assertions are too farfetched already. > "BOUNDARIES" are not measurable to us between them but incidents of beings > crossing the two "sets" are recorded. (apparitions, THE Resurrection, etc) > > Caveat.....Planes, sets etc are inadequate but most phil books tend to still > use the image. > > Let me keep researching and when I find a good description I'll post. > (all in my copius free time :-) ) ___________________________________________________________________________ Keebler { hua@cmu-cs-gandalf.arpa }