[net.religion] To DON BLACK open letter, part II

hua@cmu-cs-gandalf.ARPA (Ernest Hua) (03/07/85)

_______________________________________________________________________

> { from don black at ...decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-nisysg!black }
> 
>      As far as Communism being part of the Antichrist conspiracy,
> I  do believe the answer to that is painfully obvious.  As I have
> previously stated, there were over 600 churches in  the  city  of
> Moscow  prior  to the Bolshevik revolution.  Today there are less
> than 60.  The American Communist Party was  one  of  the  biggest
> contributors  to  the  great  atheist  theologian, Madalyn Murray
> O'Hare, during her vendetta to remove prayer from the  government
> schools.  (Let me add a few more interesting statistics about the
> altruism of the Bolsheviks.  In the first 12 months of  the  Com-
> munist  regime,  they are known to have murdered 31 bishops, 1650
> priests and ministers, and over 2 million  Chistian  lay  people.
> How much more anti-Christ can a group be?)

"Painfully"?  "OBVIOUS"?  Where have you been?  Why don't you tell
us the TOTAL figure for the number of lives terminated by the Bol-
sheviks.  I could say that there were X million women killed, and
therefore, they must be ANTI-WOMEN!  Gee, how enraging!  Painfully
obvious?  Only if one looks solely at your words and nothing else,
and only if one is easily fooled by such rhetoric.  (Lucky for you,
people ARE easily fooled by such rhetoric.)

>      And then there are those "Americans" who would want  a  Com-
> munist  government  here in the US.  I  have an  answer for them,
> but most people get squeamish at the thought.  I fear no man, and
> when I'm dead and buried, there's more like me to take my place.

Unfortunately, there will always be more  of  you  to  take  your
place.   But  hopefully,  people  will see that returning to your
"traditional values" implies returning to days  of  bigotry,  ra-
cism, prejudice, sexual oppression, etc...  Don't tell me you be-
lieve that we could possibly accomplish the return without  these
and  other  old  "goodies".   By  the way, you want a return to a
CHRISTIAN traditional environment.  What's wrong with other trad-
itional environments?  Why traditional at all?

{ CONJECTURE }
I believe that you are terribly confused  and  naive.   You  just
want  things that are nice.  You want your life to be planned out
for you.  You want the easy way out.  You want  Heaven  to  there
for  you when your life ends.  You want to avoid all the problems
in life that you have to face, or else justify  them  with  some-
thing  to the effect of "God knows best, so I will just accept it
for now."  You can make up excuses for all of this, but  you  are
not  facing  reality  for  what it is.  You keep reaching for the
rosy glasses of yesterday that helped you ignore the problems  of
the world.
{ CONJECTURE }

Did you ever notice how carefree a child is?  Noticed that it  is
so  happy  and  unsophisticated?   I would like the happiness.  I
would like to avoid the problems.  But returning to  blind  faith
in  some  thousand-year-old  book  of fairy tales is not going to
help me face these problems, and I really don't see how miserable
I could possibly be right now.

I'm  only disgusted that you and others like you  are  trying  to
blind  me  with tall tales.  Don't you think you ought to justify
the validity of the Scriptures if you want so much  for  everyone
to  return  to it?  Don't you think you ought to justify what you
are saying with some facts?  I bet you get them from some  Chris-
tian  magazine  (God  forbid should you read anything else!) like
The Plain Truth, which, like the Moral Majority, simply isn't.

The "good'ole days" were only old.
_______________________________________________________________________

Keebler