[net.religion] Is this really net.rosen?

mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate) (04/03/85)

When the newslists came out recently, I noticed that Rich contributed 60% of
net.religion in the last time period.  This piqued my curiosity, so I took
some statistics:

    In net.religion:   82 articles
                       17 posted by rich
                        8 refer directly to rich
                       40 pertain to arguments involving rich not in other
                          two categories
                       17 have nothing to do with Rich

I should point out that the vast majority of the 40 articles pertain to Don
Black and the little inquisition which followed.  According to these numbers,
80% of this group (by articles) is devoted to Rich's discussion; this number
is higher when size of articles is taken into account.

   In net.r.c:  24 articles
                 5 posted by rich
                 7 responses to rich
                12 other discussions, of which
                   7 are the "translations" discussion

So Rich is using up half of the group.


Draw your own conclusions.

Charley Wingate    umcp-cs!mangoe