[net.religion] The Bible, Divine Revelation and Mormonism

bch@mcnc.UUCP (Byron Howes) (04/18/85)

It seems to me that criticism of the Mormon faith based on ad hominum
attacks on Joseph Smith and his revelation is something that thoughtful
Christians would not want to engage in.  Revelation and prophecy are
historically proven means by which G-d enlightens man.  The claim of
revelation, no matter how absurd it may sound, cannot be dismissed
lightly by those whose own faith is founded on revelation and prophecy.

Lest we forget, many of the old-world prophets were not exactly model
citizens, much less thoughtful theologians.  It is possible that slightly
offbeat personal characteristics are required to be a Revelator.  
Joseph Smith's "seeing-stones" are not bizarre by the standards of prophets.

Finally, one has to make a case that the Bible is the final and complete
word of G-d.  One must show that it is not possible for new revelations to
be given to man by G-d which might update that which has already been
written.  Considering the Bible itself contains revelatory material that
post-dates Jesus, that revelation is entirely possible.

The above applies to the various revelations being put forth by Rich
Rosen and Mike Huybensz here as well.  One may want to criticize them
on the basis of the individuals involved, the context or the apparent
absurdity of it -- but that criticism must apply to most mainstream
faiths as well.

-- 

						Byron C. Howes
				      ...!{decvax,akgua}!mcnc!ecsvax!bch