[net.religion] Don't get mad, now...

spw2562@ritcv.UUCP (spw2562 ( Steve Wall @ Rochester Institute of Mentality ..er.. Technology )) (05/16/85)

>                                                       Creationists
> are not allowed to disagree, as they are connected to authoritarian 
> religious organizations that tell them what they think.

I don't know what religion you are talking about, but I do all my
thinking for myself,  as do all the Cristians I know.

>                                                         In fact,
> Paul is the only non-evolutionist on this net that seems to think
> at all for himself.

See above comment.

> for (;;) {
> C: creation is science!
> 
> E: no it's not!
> 
> C: well then, evolution isn't science either!
> 
> E: yes it is, there's all kinds of evidence!
> 
> C: well, there's evidence for creation too!
> 
> E: ok, what?
> 
> C: well, evolution has this and that problem, and besides, things
>    look like they were created!
> 
> E: that's not evidence!
> 
> C: yes it is!
> }
> 

Creation doesn't have to be science to be true.  There are some things which
science can't explain.  Personally, I find evolution harder to believe than
creation, just because of the problems accociated with it.

					Steve Wall
					...!ritcv!ritvp!spw2562

					flames to /dev/null, please.

padraig@utastro.UUCP (Padraig Houlahan) (05/16/85)

> Creation doesn't have to be science to be true.  There are some things which
> science can't explain.  Personally, I find evolution harder to believe than
> creation, just because of the problems accociated with it.
> 
> 					Steve Wall

That fine with me. As long as you don't claim it's science and try to 
have it taught in school science classes there's no problem.

Padraig Houlahan.