[net.philosophy] Arbitrary

williams@kirk.DEC (John Williams 223-3402) (08/26/85)

	If an object is completely " unconstrained by direct external
forces " , then it's movement is arbitrary. No, free does not mean
arbitrary. Free is an adjective, and arbitrary is an adverb.

	What I meant to imply is that some choices may be regarded
as arbitrary, hence, free will. Science can not measure that which
is not significant.

						John.

	Williams' first law of resolution:

	There will never be an end to your problems.

rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) (08/27/85)

> 	If an object is completely " unconstrained by direct external
> forces " , then it's movement is arbitrary. No, free does not mean
> arbitrary. Free is an adjective, and arbitrary is an adverb.
>  [JOHN WILLIAMS]

It wasn't enough to redefine words at whim a la Humpty Dumpty.  Now
they're out to arbitrarily (an adverb) redefine and reassign parts of
speech.

Are courses in English and communication prerequisite to a degree
in philosophy these days?  :-?????  (It's not as though this was
some stupid spelling error...)
-- 
"to be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best night and day
 to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle any human
 being can fight and never stop fighting."  - e. e. cummings
	Rich Rosen	ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr