[net.women] Natural Birth Control Methods

hutch (02/16/83)

   First, a personal aside to rabbit!jj  - 
   You take odds with the notion of papal infallibility based on the
   papal bull that condemns all methods of birth control.

   Well, I think that if birth control were subject to the doctrine (which
   doctrine I personally don't believe for other reasons) that you'd be right. 
   To the best of my knowledge, as it was explained in the last discussion I
   has with a Catholic of reasonable education about his church, the doctrine
   of papal infallibility applies only to matters of the faith, that is, the
   pope cannot be a heretic.  Birth control obviously cannot come under this
   heading, especially since Pope John (the most recent) ADVOCATED birth control
   of ANY kind, barring abortion only.  The church position is now more strict,
   allowing only "natural" birth control.


	The subject of Roman Catholic birth control methods brought to mind
	the very useful method that is being taught by the RC Church in the
	underdeveloped countries of the world.  It doesn't involve any kind
	of chemicals, drugs, surgery, or uncomfortable and questionable
	barrier devices.

	It's called "Fertility Awareness" and is based on the fact that
	there are THREE factors in human fertility:  viability of sperm,
	viability of egg and (new info) viability of transport mechanisms.

	First, some information:
	The egg will survive only about 24 hours in the woman's body, then
	it dies.  Sperm will survive at best only 5-10 minutes outside the
	human body (assuming it isn't frozen for later use) and in a nice
	dark slightly acidic vagina or uterus will survive at best a half
	hour to an hour.  This would make it very unlikely that people could
	reproduce themselves.  However, the cervix has these tiny folds and
	wrinkles (crypts) which secrete a characteristic mucus.  This mucus
	is basically a sugary-proteiny (butchering the written language) stuff,
	which will keep sperms alive for up to five days.  It also has a
	texture, which when examined under a microscope is either a blobby
	sort of maze, which acts as a barrier impeding sperms and any other
	microorganisms, or a stretched-out series of long channels, which
	act like a highway leading sperms directly up into the uterus.

	The mucus is secreted in response to the rising estrogen levels that
	are caused by a maturing egg (impending ovulation).  The mucus is
	therefore a visible sign of fertility.

	Rather than detailing the charting method, which is taught at many
	hospitals (if you are interested, look for a hospital run by just
	about any group of Catholic nuns), I will give some of the estimates
	of effectiveness and some of the drawbacks.

	The method is 99% effective as contraceptive under lab conditions,
	dropping to 96% in practice.  This is superior to the pill, which
	is given as 98% effective in lab and 94% effective in use.

	The researchers here (St Vincent's Hospital in Portland) have an
	experimentally unverified belief that the barrier methods owe
	their effectiveness to the natural fertility cycle, and that they
	are at best 68-75% effective otherwise.

	The drawback is that the woman must observe her own mucus each
	time she urinates or has a bowel movement, and that the method
	requires abstinence during potentially fertile times.  This
	includes menstruation since menstrual flow can hide the mucus.

	The method is also useful as a way of determining the best times
	to get pregnant.  Preliminary studies show that it has about a
	79% chance for impregnation at each ovulation.  It also provides
	an understanding for some "infertile" women of the underlying
	problems with their fertility.

	THIS IS NOT THE RHYTHM METHOD.  This is important.  All that the
	Rhythm method can tell you is that you have ovulated, not when
	you are fertile.

Anyway, since this is net.women, I thought I'd publicise this relatively
unknown birth control method.  I hope someone out there can find it useful.
It sure beats the pill, especially when medical problems make drugs even
more dangerous than they usually are.

Steve Hutchison

bmcjmp (02/22/83)

The name of the method described in the submission on natural birth control
is the "Billings ovulation method". There is a book out on the subject,
entitled, "THE PERSONAL FERTILITY GUIDE: How to Avoid or Achieve Pregnancy
Naturally", written by Terrie Guay, and published by Harbor Publishing,
Inc., San Francisco, CA, distributed by G.P. Putnum's Sons. It documents
some of the work of Drs. Evelyn and John Billings on this subject, and gives
a clear outline and explanation of the method. It makes a major emphasis on
the need for communication between the man and woman using the method.
Unlike other methods, this means of birth control places responsibility on
both partners. It is a definite plus for people who cannot use the better
known methods, or who find these methods a sexual turn-off. It also serves
to help women become better aware of their own bodies. Even if you use a
barrier method or the "pill", you will probably find the information on
female physiology interesting, and perhaps even surprising.
		
		Barb Puder
		burdvax!bmcjmp