[net.women] sexist language -- Chris's brother weighs in

dr_who@umcp-cs.UUCP (08/12/83)

Instead of "he", "they", or even "it", how about "she"?  One author I've
read used "he" and "she" for the universal pronoun in alternate paragraphs.
That's a pretty good solution, but it can be distracting -- one tends to be
continually aware of this detail with each new paragraph.  I propose the
logical solution:  "she" all the time.  If use of "she" for the universal
pronoun were common, or if it were used throughout an entire book instead of
every other paragraph, it would soon fade from one's consciousness (i.e., no
longer be distracting).  After all these years of "he", it wouldn't be
sexist to try "she" for a while.

Turnabout is fair play!  (Well, sometimes, anyway.)

--Paul Torek, U of MD College Park

myers@uwvax.ARPA (Jeff Myers) (08/21/83)

Paul Torek suggests the use of "she" as the impersonal pronoun.  In at least
one book I know of, an introductory Pascal text called *Oh! Pascal!*, Paul's
idea has been implemented.  The book notes its practice by saying something to
the effect that women have been forced to put up with "he" for several hundred
years, so a decade or two of "she" shouldn't hurt anyone.