[net.women] Hairy legs and monkey suits

riddle@ut-sally.UUCP (09/11/83)

(This is a reply I sent to thanh@rlgvax.UUCP over a recent item he posted
to net.women.only with the subject line "leg/armpit hair must be shaved if
shown at work".  I am posting it to net.women because I don't want to
violate net.women.only.  In fact, I think that this topic really transcends
both groups.)

   To: thanh@rlgvax.UUCP
   Subject: This isn't hate mail, but...
   References: <1136@rlgvax.UUCP>
   
   ...did it ever occur to you that there are people to whom an "office
   environment" is unpleasant precisely  b e c a u s e  it forces everyone
   into an identical mold?
   
        I am a man who finds suits and ties uncomfortable, impractical and
   repugnant, particularly in the warm climate enjoyed by much of the U.S.
   People's expectations that I dress in such a monkey suit to fit  t h e i r
   idea of how one should dress in an office make me mad.
   
        Similarly, the idea that a woman who preferred not to shave her legs
   or armpits would be pressured into doing so by her co-workers or superiors
   strikes me as a despicable, if petty, infringement on her personal matters.
   
        I happen to detest the pancake makeup and perfume worn by most women
   in a typical office environment, just as you seem to detest hairy legs
   and armpits.  Why should your standards of beauty be forced on women office-
   workers when mine aren't?
   
        I say, let those who want to sweat and be stifled in their suits or be
   plastered and scraped by their makeup and razors do so; but don't make it a
   requirement that the rest of us do the same just to conform to your sense of
   propriety.
   
        (By the way: if I have flamed a bit, please don't take it as hate mail.
   If you can express your opinion, so can I.  No personal offense is intended.)
   
                                       -- Prentiss Riddle
                                          {ihnp4,ut-ngp}!ut-sally!riddle
                                          riddle@ut-sally.{UUCP,ARPA}
   

davidl@tekid.UUCP (David Levadie) (09/13/83)

Take heart, Prentiss.  In my basement I am concocting an aerosol spray
which can be dispersed into the ventilating system of office buildings,
which will cause neckties to immediately shrink to 1/10 of their former
size.  I feel that I should also produce a feminine analog, in order
to avoid charges of sexism.  I considered trying to turn perfume into
cyanide gas but it might take out some Innocent Bystanders.  Any
suggestions?  (Besides psychotherapy.)

shebs@utah-cs.UUCP (Stanley Shebs) (09/14/83)

That was a good suggestion, to make neckties shrink (there's a similar
concept in D&D, only it was shrinking necklaces - but then all women
don't wear both necklaces and makeup).  Perhaps the gas could make
the makeup turn into itching powder, poison ivy oil, or maybe some
kind of contact poison...

Actually, I've found a good inverse relation between the trustworthiness
of a person and how much that person dresses up at work.  It also lets
you know who's bucking for management.

					Wearing patched-up climbing shorts,
					stan the lep hacker
					utah-cs!shebs

speaker@umcp-cs.UUCP (09/18/83)

An inverse relationship between how much a person dresses
up for work and how trustworthy they are?  A good indicator
of who's bucking for managment?

I've found that those bucking for managment take on the characteristics
of their managers.  Whatever the boss likes, his understudy will
like.  The real posturing boot-lickers don't stand out with the
latest Pierre Cardin fasions.  They use the attitudes of their
bosses as mandates to further their own ends.

Clothes aren't the measure of the man (or should that be person?)
and I should hope that any manager knows this.
-- 
					- Speaker
					speaker@umcp-cs
					speaker.umcp-cs@UDel-Relay

This must be hell...all I can see are flames... towering flames!