ofut@gatech.UUCP (11/18/83)
It seems to me that in the old days when we hacked each other with swords that there was a good reason for women not being in wars as much as men. They aren't usually as strong. Guns, however, don't take a lot of strength. What counts most in todays wars is endurance and I don't think men have more natural endurance than women. I guess now the reason is mostly social. I can't see that as being valid. -- Jeff Offutt School of ICS, Georgia Tech, Atlanta GA CSNet: Ofut @ GATech ARPA: Ofut.GATech @ Csnet-Relay uucp: ...!{akgua,allegra,rlgvax,sb1,unmvax,ulysses,ut-sally}!gatech!ofut
leff@smu.UUCP (11/25/83)
#R:gatech:-222500:smu:18900006:000:456 smu!leff Nov 24 14:47:00 1983 There was an article in a Dallas paper regarding an unusual game played with guns that shoot paint. The objective is to simulate war as well as possible without all the blood and gore. If you get hit with the paint, you are out of the game, dead. There was some sort of objective like stealing a flag (I forget exactly what). Women actually did better than men since the men would often go galumphing along making a lot of noise and make easy targets.