[net.women] MEN in net.women.only !? Egads!

wisen@inmet.UUCP (01/13/84)

#N:inmet:10900028:000:1082
inmet!wisen    Jan 11 11:31:00 1984

	I just went "slumming" in net.women.only, where I clearly don't
belong and should have no interest, and I saw many notes by MEN (!), several
of which discussed penises (!!).   WOMEN of the network, it looks to me as if
you are losing sight of your original objective to have a place where you 
could discuss personal things, without interference from men.   MEN of the 
network, I think it would be gentlemanly of you to grant the women their 
privacy; the least you could do is not to bitch at them in their own 
net group!
	If men want to discuss circumcision and such, perhaps we should create
a net.men.only [ for discussion of such critical issues as jock itch, not for
conspiring to oppress women, of course :-) ].   Does this sound terribly
Victorian?
	Perhaps you should move the discussion of circumcision/clitordectomies
(sp?) to net.misc, and thereby offend everybody :-)
						.
						|\
	------Bruce Wisentaner		       /| \
	cca!ima!inmet			      / |  \
	   	     } !wisen	 o	     /  |   \
	  harpo!inmet 		 ^_.       _/___|=====
				O\/`O	     \_______/]
						\_(