[net.women] Cosmetics and animal testing long

features@ihuxf.UUCP (M.A. Zeszutko) (03/01/84)

There's been extensive debate for some time about the need for women
in the work force to wear makeup.  Without getting too heavily
into it, I would like to pass on a submission I found in net.pets.
If you do wear makeup, you might keep the names of the companies
on the humane side in mind.
(Note:  the following material is NOT for the squeamish.)

Mary Ann Zeszutko   AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
ihnp4!ihuxf!features

***Begin forwarded article***
From ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uicsl!twt Wed Dec 31 18:00:00 1969
Relay-Version: version B 2.10.1exp 10/6/83; site ihuxf.UUCP
Path: ihuxf!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uicsl!twt
From: twt@uicsl.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.pets
Subject: cosmetics - (nf)
Message-ID: <5906@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 27-Feb-84 21:46:52 CST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.5906
Posted: Mon Feb 27 21:46:52 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 28-Feb-84 04:32:40 CST
Lines: 78

#N:uicsl:19200008:000:4023
uicsl!twt    Feb 27 17:49:00 1984


         Something I picked up at my friendly neighborhood humane society.
         (Champaign County Humane Society.)

         The cosmetic industry uses four basic tests on animals.  They are:
         eye irritation or Draize test, shampoos and cosmetics are put into
         rabbits eyes which are fastened open.  The chemical causes
         blistering, swelling and blindness.  The pain often becomes so
         intense that the rabbit breaks its back trying to get away from
         it.  Skin irritation test, the test animal has an area of its back
         stripped of fur and the test product repeatedly rubbed into the
         bare skin area causing rash, pain and swelling.  LD/50 test
         (Lethal Dose 50% die), cosmetics are force fed to test animals to
         determine the amount necessary to cause 50% of them to die in
         severe agony from such things as organ blockage, toxic reaction
         and convulsions.  Inhalation test, animals are placed in small
         boxes and sprayed repeatedly in the face for a 2 1/2 hour period,
         then killed and their tissues examined.  Remember this when you
         purchase cosmetics and select a brand that doesn't test on live
         animals.

         The following list of cosmetic companies has been compiled by the
         Animal Protection Institute of America.  Use it when purchasing
         cosmetics and other possible animal tested products such as
         toothpaste, shampoo, mouthwash, talcum, hand lotion, lipstick, eye
         cosmetics, face creams, hair conditioners, perfumes and colognes.
         If the product is on the list of animal tested products below
         don't buy and tell your dealer why and then take time to write the
         company and tell them also.

         COMPANIES WHICH DO NOT TEST   COMPANIES WHICH TEST EXTENSIVELY
         ON LIVE ANIMALS               &/OR USE ANIMAL PRODUCTS

         Barth's                       Alberto Culver
         Beauty Without Cruelty        Almay Corporation
         British-American Cosmetics,   Amway Corporation
           Ltd.                        Elizabeth Arden
         Campana Corp, Ltd.            Avon Products, Inc.
         Comfort Manufacturing Co.     Ayerst Laboratories
         Compton & Knowles Co.         Bonne Bell
         Con-Stan Industries, Intl.    John H. Breck
         Cosmetic Creations, Inc.      Bristol-Meyers
         Dodge Chemical Co.            Carter-Wallace, Inc.
         Duke Laboratories             Catteu Drug and Chemical
         Fashion Twenty-Two            Charles of the Ritz
         Dorothy Gray                  Chesebrough-Ponds Co.
         Hain Pure Food Co.            Clairol, Inc.
         Hickok - A Man's Company      Clinique Laboratories, Inc.
         Houbigant, Inc.               Coty Products
         Humphreys Pharmacal, Inc.     Helene Curtis Industries
         Lander Co., Inc.              Dana Perfumes, Inc.
         Melton International, Inc.    Estee Lauder, Inc.
         Mennen Corp.                  Mary Kay Cosmetics
         Mohawk Brush Co.              Max Factor
         Shaklee Products              Gillette Co.
         Roberts-L.E.Robert Co Inc     Andrew Jergens Co.
         Velvet Products Co.           Jhirmack
         Vitabath, Inc.                Johnson & Johnson
         Yardley                       LaMaur, Inc.
                                       Lanvin
                                       Maybelline
                                       Mem Co., Inc.
                                       Noxell Corporation
                                       Olay Co.
                                       Redken
                                       Revlon, Inc.
                                       Roche Laboratories
                                       Helena Rubinstein
                                       Warner Lambert
                                       Zotos International


Just thought you might like to know.

Mary

karn@allegra.UUCP (Phil Karn) (03/02/84)

Seems to me that the best way to protest the use of animals in cosmetic
testing is to just do without cosmetics altogether.  Suppose you buy a
cosmetic from a "humane" company, and it puts YOU in severe agony
instead because its caustic effects weren't found in pre-market testing.

The cosmetic industry is a multi-billion-dollar black hole, and anything
is reason enough to cut their chunk of the GNP down a little.

Phil

mat@hou5d.UUCP (M Terribile) (03/05/84)

Hmm.  I would strongly recommend that ou PREFER the products of companies
that test with animals.  If the products are not being tested on animals,
aren't they being tested on YOU?

Of course, if the product is so damaging to the animal, what are they doing
selling it for use by humans?

					Mark Terribile
					hou5d!mat