lipman@decwrl.UUCP (03/07/84)
From: squirt::arndt From: SMURF::ARNDT 7-MAR-1984 14:52 To: SQUIRT::ARNDT Subj: another one Somewhere out there is a professor of logic who is watching this mess and getting reams of material on how not to make sense. Don't worry pro-abortionists, you're not complete failures in the thinking department. You are serving as bad examples! >The "pro-lifers" always present the issue as a religious or >philosophical question . . . . The woman is conveniently pushed out of >the picture . . . . >It's the ->woman<- who should decide which of the various philosophical >points of view she will accept. Nit Wit!! Opps! I have to be careful. I mean Nit Wit Sir. The basic question IS philosphical or religious as you admit in your second blurb. Does one have to be a woman to entertain a philosophical question? (I just noticed that I assumed that this unsigned posting was from a male. Strange, huh. Does that get me points with the broads?) The sex of the asker has no bearing on the answer to the question of the status of the fetus. The question of the woman's rights can only be properly answered AFTER the status of the fetus can be determined. Then their rights have to be balanced off against each other if the fetus is a human being. Why do I feel like I've stumbled into Mrs. Carlson's fifth grade class? Ken Arndt P.S. Sophie says sign your trash!