[net.women] Bathrooms: equality?

saquigley@watmath.UUCP (Sophie Quigley) (06/14/84)

Women do take longer to go to the bathroom, but they also have to go more often
than men.  I was told at one point that our bladders, even though they are the
same size as men's, tend to feel full faster because of pressure from the uterus

Whether this is true, I don't know, but I noticed that my women friends and I
certainly go to the bathroom more frequently than men.

The Kitchener Center in the Square auditorium (which is fairly new) has 
3 women bathrooms/ 1 men.  At intermission the lines for each bathroom are 
about the same length.  It looks like they got their ratios right.

Sophie Quigley
...!{clyde,ihnp4,decvax}!watmath!saquigley

agust@spuxll.UUCP (Agust K Gudmundsson) (06/14/84)

Womens also tend to have a higher occurence of bladder infections (cystitis)
 than men.
I'm not sure why or in what ratio but that does seem to be the case.
This insight came about from reading up on the subject when my wife
contracted an esspecially acute case of this some years back.

					Icelandic Cowboy
					Agust K. G.

PS Then again maybe women go to the bathrooms so often to talk to the fish
	who leave their bicycles outside. :+>.

cmgiuliani@watmath.UUCP (cmgiuliani) (06/15/84)

The differences that tend to exist between men's and women's bathrooms have 
always baffled me.  I  became aware of such differences in residence.  For one
thing, the bathrooms in the women's residences always had better quality
toilet tissue.  Trivial but true.  Also, women's shower facilities would
often consist of individual booths, while the men's were tiled rooms with
several shower heads.  I noticed this same difference in showers in the
dressing rooms at the Theatre here at the University.  What bugs me is how
somebody decides to make these different provisions.

Does an architect routinely design the men's showers to be different from
the women's?  Is it obvious to the supplies clerk that women should have
softer bathroom tissue than men?  What makes these people decide things
like this?

Incidently, this is not always to the women's advantage.  At the theatre,
the space that provided for 4 shower heads in the men's dressing room only
held room for 2 individual booths in the women's.

                     Carlo @ the U of Waterloo

nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (Doug Alan) (06/15/84)

The way to equality of bathrooms is to make them coed.  There's no such
thing as "seperate but equal".
-- 
				-Doug Alan
				 mit-eddie!nessus
				 Nessus@MIT-MC

				"What does 'I' mean"?

 

tron@fluke.UUCP (Peter F. Barbee) (06/18/84)

This bathroom discussion has reminded me of an interesting situation,
I'm not sure if it's discriminatory or not.

Did you ever notice how the line at the women's john is longer than
at the men's.  This is especially true if fairly equal numbers of men
and women are present.  There are obvious reasons (basically women 
tend to take longer).

Now the question; should the designers of a public building allocate
more room for the women's johns?  In some ways this is the same topic
as pensions (not all ways, some- no need for flames), i.e. women and
men are different and distinguishable, do we artificially force (or
facilitate) equality.

			Maybe I've been glaring at the phoshor too long,
			Peter Barbee

   decvax-+-uw-beaver-+
   ihnp4--+   allegra-+
   ucbvax----lbl-csam-+--fluke!tron
		  sun-+
	      ssc-vax-+

Pucc-H:Pucc-I:ags@CS-Mordred.UUCP (06/19/84)

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site houxe.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pucc-i
Message-ID: <324@pucc-i>
Date: Tue, 19-Jun-84 15:02:35 EDT

ie.UUCP>
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
Lines: 10

>  The way to equality of bathrooms is to make them coed.  There's no such
>  thing as "seperate but equal".

Now you've done it.  You just killed ERA for another 20 years.

(Anyone notice that busses and airplanes already have coed bathrooms?)
-- 

Dave Seaman			"My hovercraft is full of eels."
..!pur-ee!pucc-i:ags

ags@pucc-i (Seaman) (06/19/84)

>  The way to equality of bathrooms is to make them coed.  There's no such
>  thing as "seperate but equal".

Now you've done it.  You just killed ERA for another 20 years.

(Anyone notice that busses and airplanes already have coed bathrooms?)
-- 

Dave Seaman			"My hovercraft is full of eels."
..!pur-ee!pucc-i:ags

afo@pucc-k (sefton) (06/20/84)

>(anyone notice that busses and airplanes already have coed bathrooms?)

Are the bathrooms at your home *not* coed?

Laurie
pucc-k:afo

cmgiuliani@watmath.UUCP (cmgiuliani) (06/21/84)

Yet another pecularity:

  On the canadian LRC trains, each car has two bathrooms -- one marked with
  the symbols of both a man and a woman (presumably OR, not AND :-) and the
  other marked only as a women's.  

                      Carlo @ the U of Waterloo

saquigley@watmath.UUCP (Sophie Quigley) (06/21/84)

From cmgiuliani

>Yet another pecularity:
>
>  On the canadian LRC trains, each car has two bathrooms -- one marked with
>  the symbols of both a man and a woman (presumably OR, not AND :-) and the
>  other marked only as a women's.  
>
>                      Carlo @ the U of Waterloo
>
Yeah, and I checked both types out a few days ago.  There is not difference
between the two except that the one with the two symbols is twice as big
as the one with one symbol.  Maybe they are for a man AND a woman after
all (-:

Sophie Quigley
...!{clyde,ihnp4,decvax}!watmath!saquigley

sunny@decwrl.UUCP (06/22/84)

Relay-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decvax.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 SMI; site sun.uucp
Message-ID: <1292@sun.uucp>
Date: Fri, 22-Jun-84 04:45:40 EDT
Date-Received: Fri, 22-Jun-84 08:18:01 EDT

ie.UUCP> <324@pucc-i>
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Lines: 3

you seem to not see the difference which I see between co-ed and single-user.
Busses and Planes do *not* have co-ed bathrooms.
[ucbvax,decvax,ihnp4]!sun!sunny	(Sunny Kirsten of Sun Microsystems)

nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (06/23/84)

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site houxe.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Message-ID: <2233@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Jun-84 23:58:27 EDT

ie.UUCP> <324@pucc-i> <1292@sun.uucp>
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 19

>	From: sunny@sun.uucp (Sunny Kirsten)

>	you seem to not see the difference which I see between co-ed and
>	single-user.  Busses and Planes do *not* have co-ed bathrooms.

Coedness and single-userness are orthogonal properties.  Coed
single-user bathrooms are fair.  Any type of segregated bathroom system
is unfair.  Busses and planes often have coed single-user bathrooms.
Sometimes they have segregated single-user bathrooms.  Why in the world
anyone would segregate single-user bathrooms is beyond me! But they even
do it in my dorm during the summer when fuddy-duddy industry people room
there to take courses at MIT.
-- 
				-Doug Alan
				 mit-eddie!nessus
				 Nessus@MIT-MC

				"What does 'I' mean"?

 

riddle@ut-sally.UUCP (Prentiss Riddle) (06/27/84)

>> (Anyone notice that busses and airplanes already have coed bathrooms?)

So are many bathrooms for the handicapped.