[net.women] 0.1% of humankind

chabot@amber.DEC (Lisa S. Chabot) (07/27/84)

Donald Graft  =  >

> Rich Rosen spends 18 lines telling us he thinks 99.9% of humankind have
> their minds turned off on ALL subjects.  No doubt he considers himself
> part of that 0.1%.  Rich, if what you say is true why do you waste your
> breath??  If it is not true, then why wasn't the posting in net.jokes?  Why
> don't you do us a favor and take a permanent sabbatical?

Don't many of us believe ourselves to be part of that 0.1%? (or whatever 
percentage we choose)  I do, and I consider you folks to be so too, or at
least we're potentially able to be part of the 0.1%.  So, don't we often
give each other the benefit of the doubt and write something we hope will
be read and thought about?
I don't know about breathing: some of you humans appear to type fast and 
therefore don't need to breathe many times while typing.  Permanent sabbatical
always sounds like a fine idea to me! (somewhere nice, with near a lake, under
a shady tree with a book propped conveniently...oops, sorry, forgot that if
I want to post my favorite single positions it should be to net.singles) 
Except, I feed on the rays emitted by crts, and it would be less fun feeding if
one of those adding spice to the newsgroups were to leave off. 

Buzz,
L S Chabot

UUCP:	...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
ARPA:	...chabot%amber.DEC@decwrl.ARPA
USFail:    DEC, MR03-1/K20, 2 Iron Way, Marlborough, MA  01752