[net.women] Do Statistics Prove Discrimination Against Women?

prudence@trwrba.UUCP (08/03/84)

.......
     Once more the demagogues are lying with statistics, and
once more shall I set the record straight, though I have
long since lost faith in the power of truth against willful
ignorance.
     The statistical lie is that women are victims of discri-
mination because they earn less than men.
     The facts are these:  In 1978, the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission released the results of the most
expensive, most thorough investigation of this subject ever
undertaken.  It confirmed that the average woman makes less
than the average man -- that was never in doubt -- but it
found absolutely no evidence that this was because of
discrimination.  Instead, the study found that the average
woman takes more part-time jobs than the average man, that
the average woman drops out of the job market for longer
than the average man, that the average woman has less educa-
tion than the average man, that the average woman is less
likely to take a unionized job than the average man, and so
on and so forth.  In short, when women are compared with
equally qualified men in competition for the same jobs, the
study confirmed that the average woman will be paid at least
as much as the man.  She will, in fact, earn more thanks to
Affirmative Action.
     Sexual discrimination is wrong, period.

chabot@amber.DEC (Lisa S. Chabot) (08/07/84)

Sorry, I've seen equal job, equal experience, unequal pay discrimination.
Where have I seen such?  Other people, or me at other jobs.  It does exist.

Another thing I've personally seen in another job (another place) was all the
old boys were indeed boys.  When they started the project it was going to be
rough and tough and no girls needed, when they got a foothold technically and
in terms of respect of the hospital administration, then there was room.
At the bottom.  Probably such a upward-limited position is not *supposed* to
attract men, who are supposed to aggressive.

L S Chabot
UUCP:	...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
ARPA:	...chabot%amber.DEC@decwrl.ARPA
USFail:    DEC, MR03-1/K20, 2 Iron Way, Marlborough, MA  01752

smb@ulysses.UUCP (Steven Bellovin) (08/07/84)

I have to discount Lisa's stories, because they're anecdotal (as opposed to
statistically significant).  But I've seen *many* Labor Department studies
that back her up -- discrimination does exist, even after one corrects for
education, experience, interrupted careers, etc.  In fact, there was one
that appeared within the last year.  One that I saw about 5 years ago was
restricted to scientists and engineers.  Guess what -- same effect.

Now, the magnitude of the salary gap is certainly due to many factors other
than discrimination, though I suspect that most of them -- sex-stereotyped
jobs, lack of math/science background by women, etc. -- can be attributed
to prevailing sexist attitudes.  But don't kid yourself -- equal pay for
equal work may be the law, but it's sure not reality.

phil@amd.UUCP (Phil Ngai) (08/08/84)

While we're on the subject of discrimination, I heard the claim
that Bell Labs/ATT was very good about raising the consciousness of
its employees, so much so that many of them forget the "real world"
isn't like Bell Labs.

This was from a couple of Bell Labs employees.
-- 

 Phil Ngai (408) 982-6554
 UUCPnet: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra,intelca}!amd!phil
 ARPAnet: amd!phil@decwrl.ARPA

annej@hammer.UUCP (Anne Jacko) (08/08/84)

I would guess that your statements are sound, as far as they go.
I feel a pertinent question to ask when citing the different
job history of men and women is "Why?"  Do women take non-unionized
jobs because they don't like unions?  Do they work part-time because
they don't want to work full-time?  For some women, the answer
may be yes.  But I would guess that most of these women end up in
different sorts of jobs due to lack of opportunity for the
better-paying, higher-status jobs mostly held my men.

And professions that are traditionally female bring in less
money than professions that are traditionally male, even when
the skill and education level is similar.  Examples: grade school
teachers vs. junior bank officers; nurses vs. engineers.

Sexism isn't just a factor when you have a man and a woman doing
exactly the same job and the woman is paid less.  It is much more
subtle (and consequently more insidious) than that.

Anne Jacko, Tektronix