[net.women] why is there no net.men?

paul@politik.UUCP (Paul Vixie) (09/02/84)

Just curious, really.

	Paul Vixie	{mtxinu|{sun!texsun}|ptsfa}!politik!paul

sunny@sun.uucp (Sunny Kirsten) (09/05/84)

Greetings:

	There IS a net.men
	It is the set net.* != net.women*

-- 
{ucbvax|decvax|ihnp4}!sun!sunny (Sunny Kirsten of Sun Microsystems)

dubois@uwmacc.UUCP (Paul DuBois) (09/06/84)

I believe it has something to do with the gender of God...
-- 
Paul DuBois		{allegra,ihnp4,seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!dubois

Thy testimonies have I taken as an heritage forever: for they
are the rejoicing of my heart.
					Psalm 119:111

tj@sun.uucp (Cal Thixton) (09/07/84)

>         There IS a net.men
>         It is the set net.* != net.women*

	For the Same reason there is no net.motos
		(members of the opposite sex ~ heterosexual)
--
{ucbvax|decvax|ihnp4}!sun!tj (Cal Thixton of Sun Microsystems)

-- 
			Cal Thixton
			Sun Microsystems
			sun!tj