greenber@acf4.UUCP (10/10/84)
<> Thank you, Jeff. Just for informations sake, a heck of a lot of people seem to agree that this is a worthy issue for discussion, and I'll be preparing a summary for the net shortly. There is a relevance to all this: Such a thing supposedly occurred at the New Bedford Rape Case a short while ago, according to transcripts that I've read. Ross M. Greenberg @ NYU ----> allegra!cmcl2!acf4!greenber <----
jeffw@tekecs.UUCP (10/13/84)
> It's idiocy like this that makes net.women so aggravating these days. | | v > What the hell do you care, Ross? Are you planning to get yourself in > such a situation? That's got to be it, otherwise a bright guy like > you would have added some imaginative twists, say, he sics Rex the > Wonder Dog on her, has 2nd thoughts, tries to call the dog off, but > the dog also, for "those male animalistic reasons" chooses to continue, > etc, etc. So the answer, Ross, is: You get a free phone call--call > your lawyer. > -- > *** *** > JE MAINTIENDRAI ***** ***** > ****** ****** 04 Oct 84 [13 Vendemiaire An CXCIII] > ken perlow ***** ***** > (312)979-7188 ** ** ** ** > ..ihnp4!ihuxq!ken *** *** Your first line said it all. I think Ross's question was quite interesting, even if it's not too likely to come up in real life. Does anybody besides me wonder how many of the people arguing so insistently about sex and rape on this newsgroup are virgins? Or nearly so? Even ornerier, Jeff Winslow
dbb@opus.UUCP (David B. Bordeau) (10/15/84)
> Does anybody besides me wonder how many of the > people arguing so insistently about sex and rape on this newsgroup are virgins> ? > Or nearly so? > Even ornerier, > Jeff Winslow Interesting question Mr.Winslow, but, how many do you think would answer honestly!