[net.women] Brook Sheilds & her"dates" and womans preferances

chabot@amber.DEC (L 'S' Chabot) (12/13/84)

amdcad!hemanth  =  >
> He would probably treat Ms. Sheilds  very nicely ...  so that she would never
> get to respect him since he cannot  put her down from the pedestal!!. 
> On the other hand if she did find a guy who would treat her in a derogatory
> manner  at least if not all the time , some time, then the relation  is liabel
> to go sour, since she would have the trauma of feeling  that she has lost "it"
> whatever "it" is in a woman's lingo. 

Uh, excuse me, but why are there only two possibilities here?

	1) pedeastal

	2) treated in a derogatory manner

What about being treated as an equal, as a human being?

Looks to me like you're discussing the angel/whore division of camps in the How
to Handle Women debate.  Surprise!  Women are people!  Treat people like people!

> It is possible that several theories may be tested out if one merely watches
> and sees how she is going to turn out in her life, Anybody interested? 

No.  Generalizing about my life based on the follies of public figures has
little appeal (no, no, really, I only buy the enquirer-type-rags when they have
pictures of computers on the covers!).

L S Chabot
UUCP:	...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
ARPA:	...chabot%amber.DEC@decwrl.ARPA
USFail:    DEC, MR03-1/K20, 2 Iron Way, Marlborough, MA  01752
shadow:	[ISSN 0018-9162 v17 #10 p7, bottom vt100, col3, next to next to last]