[net.women] in my defense: non-sexual/denominational .....

del@dataio.UUCP (Erik Lindberg) (12/25/84)

< eatme >

Dear Phil,

      I am not sure why you chose to direct your flame at me. In general,
I agree with you. My article was not a flame, but merely intended to try
and eliminate the "male against female" tone of the current discussion.
My articles are posted with exaggerated opinions to get the point across,
because the "handbook of nettiquette" says you should write very simply,
since most readers read at the level of a child. I guess that is good
advice, and I will try even harder to follow it in the future. My
appologies to all for this being here, but if I ever offend anyone, I
want it to be intentional.

.....these lines include from 50 line posting......

> (this flame brought to you by the end of Phil's patience)
> 
> > of airs). It is not the responsibility of any person to expend any
> > effort anticipating other peoples' insecurities (with the possible
> 
> This sounds like something a hermit would say. I would hope no
> responsible member of a community would believe this.
> 
Aw, c'mon Phil!

Erik Lindberg	AKA	del 
...!uw-beaver!teltone!dataio!del

( Life is like a rose. It looks pretty, but don't grab on too tight! )