ellis@spar.UUCP (Michael Ellis) (06/26/85)
>I resent being lumped into a category (violent, dumb, etc.) just as much as >anyone who is the butt of prejudice. -- Roy Mongiovi But you ARE stupid, Mr. Mongiovi. You have totally either ignored or misunderstood what has been said here. You insult the entire newsgroup. You treat this like net.flame, where you obviously belong. Is this net.male.chauvinist.pigs? I thought it was net.women. Why are you here? Readers of this net.women are urged to delete "net.flame" when replying to future articles. -michael =============== Gems of Wisdom from Mr. Mongiovi ================== >***[465@gitpyr] > >Seriously, I am astonished at the attitudes of a number of women >in this newsgroup. You all seem to be pretty rabid (no pun) men- >haters. > >***[489@gitpyr] > >What I actually had in mind is that a woman dressing in a "provocative" (and >let's not get into the discussion of what's provocative, eh?) fashion could >cause a man to approach her with a proposition. Actually, I never considered >violence. I really prefer sex when both parties cooperate. In any case, I >feel that if you dress in such a manner, it isn't the man's fault for mis- >reading the signals.... >***[490@gitpyr] > >My credibility has been gone for years, why else would I be posting to this >ridiculous female-chauvinist (to coin a phrase) newsgroup? In the past I have >been told (by this very newsgroup) that I cannot call a female a "girl".. =END=OF=BS=