[net.women] Reply to Cheryl Stewart

frye@cuuxa.UUCP (frye) (07/02/85)

These are my thoughts on Cheryl's last posting (for what they
are worth). She was talking about how all the bimbos, buzzards
clowns and fools, from both sides, were making things mizerable
for her after she married "dumbo". I feel that its really sad
that she didn't have a signed contract along with that wedding
liscence. I wonder if a person could require that all members
from both families sign a contract. If they breach the contract
they could be taken to court and sued for interfering with a
marriage that -in writing- excludes all outside interference
including, but not limited to, screwed up attitudes of people
who are jealous. (Yeah, I think that's the cause of the problem.
She had guts enough to do what they didn't so, they try to make
her feel guilty. I wonder if they even consciously knew they were
causing her grief.) I think though, that a contract like I cited
above would make people think before they open their mouths.

Here's a question for you kind folks out there. I really wanna
know. What the hell makes people feel that, just because she's
female that she wants to have a bunch of kids? I know more than
one female who doesn't want kids, probably never will, and has
been hurt badly by fools who call her abnormal. I feel that if
"dumbo" had smartened up his kin a little, Cheryl could have
probably handled her relatives. But no, she had to get it from
both sides at once. (About the kids issue and employment and
education.) Sounds like she was lucky to get rid of the clown.
Also sounds like she didn't even need a kid around as long as
she had him.




Sometimes I think people only think they think....
I know, me too. But, I do try to keep my foolishness
to a minimum.

Just my thoughts, 

T. R. Frye