scott@hou2g.UUCP (N. Ersha) (07/22/85)
>>Nobody has the right to expect ME to pay for their children >>(via welfare, etc.) except for the case above. If their religion >>doesn't allow or believe in birth control, that's just tough shit. >>Make BIRTH CONTROL free--it's a lot cheaper than welfare support >>payments. >> Scott >It happens that women with one child, or two, need child care >facilities as much as those with ten. Regardless of the number >of children, you can't just leave them alone in the house all >day. My point was more concerned with support to feed and house, not to "babysit", although I certainly understand the need there as well. But why are there 10 kids in the first place? >Of course, you're better off here if you have a lot of children, >since then some of them are older and can look after the younger >ones. Oh, now I understand. It made sense on a farm; these days I'm not sure. >Now that birth control is free, how about making it possible for >people to get it without other people harassing them? These harassers are likely the ones whose "religion" won't let them believe in birth control, and they're hell-bent on preventing anyone else from using it either. It's a sad world... Scott