[net.women] Anti-rape tactics - a revision

oaf@mit-vax.UUCP (Oded Feingold) (07/21/85)

			  The story so far:

Eric McColm mentioned that women's defensive tactics, if known, would
likely be foiled, since there's no reason to assume a rapist is
unintelligent.  Hence any such tactics suggested by men were suspect,
and women should decide what response they were comfortable with and
keep their plans private.

I suggested that people's normal association into peer groups should
provide a source of mutual and support, for example a set of known
(and accountable) escorts for women walking home at night, after a
party, whatever.

There have been several negative responses, both in mail and postings,
indicating that since rapists and victims often know each other, such
a proposal has little merit.  Someone claimed that a person who
assaulted a woman in the context of walking her home would only be in
"deep shit" with his peer group if she was in the group too.  [That's
a misdirected jab, since were she NOT in the nominal peer group,
having friends in common, even if she had a prior association with the
man, then the conditions I set forth weren't being followed.]

A common theme in these criticisms is that people are involved with
peer groups that encourage rape and macho attitudes.
>	Actually, if anything untoward happens, the woman
>	must have "asked for it." After all, she let him
>	walk her home, and that probably meant that she
>	asked him in, and we all *know* what that means.
>
>	Don't we? 
>
>	Especially if the woman was inebriated.  Then she is
>	*really* asking for it.
>						Ariel Shattan
The number and vehemence of such replies gives them a certain cogency.
I don't doubt those feelings are sincere.

But that cogency depends on the "peer group" being the way it's
purported; macho, exploitive (redundant?), unsympathetic...  It
strikes me that anyone who recognizes such characteristics among their
"friends" has the wrong friends.

I'll revise my suggestion:  Find a peer group that DOESN'T manifest
such attitudes.  Go to parties among real friends, not men who'll rape
you once liquor overcomes their inhibitions.  [Consider the joys of
not getting plastered at parties, nor going to parties where getting
shitfaced is the business of the evening.]  If you can't find a set of
friends, colleagues, whatever, whom you'll trust not to assault you
there's something very wrong.

Once you've done that, try my original suggestion.  If you're involved
with a sexist crowd, you have a difficult readjustment coming, not
least of which is rebuilding your self-image (consciousness-raising).

Feel free to shoot it down. 
-- 
Oded Feingold				{decvax, harvard}!mitvax!oaf
MIT AI Lab				oaf%oz@mit-mc.ARPA
545 Tech Sq.				617-253-8598 work
Cambridge, Mass. 02139			617-371-1796 home 

norman@lasspvax.UUCP (Norman Ramsey) (08/03/85)

>But that cogency depends on the "peer group" being the way it's
>purported; macho, exploitive (redundant?), unsympathetic...  It
>strikes me that anyone who recognizes such characteristics among their
>"friends" has the wrong friends.
>
>I'll revise my suggestion:  Find a peer group that DOESN'T manifest
>such attitudes.  Go to parties among real friends, not men who'll rape
>you once liquor overcomes their inhibitions.  [Consider the joys of
>not getting plastered at parties, nor going to parties where getting
>shitfaced is the business of the evening.]  If you can't find a set of
>friends, colleagues, whatever, whom you'll trust not to assault you
>there's something very wrong.
>
>Once you've done that, try my original suggestion.  If you're involved
>with a sexist crowd, you have a difficult readjustment coming, not
>least of which is rebuilding your self-image (consciousness-raising).
>

Sounds great! Where have these people been hiding?
(I'm serious, by the way -- aside from *some* of my colleagues (I'm a
grad student in phsyics), I haven't met any people like this since leaving
college.
 
Norman