GMP@psuvm.BITNET (08/11/85)
WE WILL BE HOLDING A CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN MALE/FEMALE RELATIONSHIPS AT BEGINNING OF APRIL (2-5). THE PURPOSE IS TO DEVELOP JOINT PUBLICATIONS (SEEKERS OF TENURE TAKE NOTICE). THIS IS OUR THIRD CONFERENCE. ATTENDANCE IS BY COMPETITIVE SELECTION. FOR INFORMATION WRITE G. M. PHILLIPS, 225 SPARKS BUILDING, PSU, UNIVERSITY PARK, PA 16802. WE ARE LOOKING FOR HEAVY DUTY NUMBER CRUNCHERS, SIMULATION SPECIALISTS, GAMES THEORISTS, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MAYVINS, AND ANYONE WHO HAS A GOOD, NON-POLITICAL RESEARCH QUESTION ABOUT MEN AND WOMEN COMMUNICATING TOGETHER. INCIDENTALLY, WHY IS THERE A NET.WOMEN BUT NO NET.MEN. GMP AT PSUVM !mcnc!akgua!psuvax!psuvm.bitnet!gmp
greenber@timeinc.UUCP (Ross M. Greenberg) (08/14/85)
In article <2069GMP@psuvm> GMP@psuvm.BITNET writes: >.... INCIDENTALLY, WHY IS THERE A NET.WOMEN BUT NOT A NET.MEN. Because that would be sexist, sillygoose! -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Ross M. Greenberg @ Time Inc, New York --------->{vax135 | ihnp4}!timeinc!greenber<--------- I highly doubt that Time Inc. would make me their spokesperson. ---
gadfly@ihuxn.UUCP (Gadfly) (08/14/85)
-- > >.... INCIDENTALLY, WHY IS THERE A NET.WOMEN BUT NOT A NET.MEN. > Because that would be sexist, sillygoose! > > Ross M. Greenberg No, it's because there already *is* a net.men. A/k/a net.flame, net.politics, and just about every other newsgroup (including this one)--totally dominated by men. And that's what it's all about, ain't it, guys? -- *** *** JE MAINTIENDRAI ***** ***** ****** ****** 14 Aug 85 [27 Thermidor An CXCIII] ken perlow ***** ***** (312)979-7753 ** ** ** ** ..ihnp4!iwsl8!ken *** ***