[net.women] T.P.

nax@cornell.UUCP (08/15/85)

From: nax (Nax-Paul)

[Like aversion, shocked (OW!) for the very first time]

In article <1083@mhuxt.UUCP> js2j@mhuxt.UUCP (sonntag)  posits

>     So apparently, either:
>	a.) Sunny's right, but my mind is too clouded by testosterone to
>	    realize it.
>	b.) Sunny is wrong.

Bad news, Jeff, this kind of binary thinking (excluded muddle, no less)
is a sure sign of T.P.

					nax~paul   cornell!nax

features@ihuxf.UUCP (M.A. Zeszutko) (08/17/85)

Omigod! Not the dreaded toilet-paper discussion again!
> From: nax (Nax-Paul)
> 
> [Like aversion, shocked (OW!) for the very first time]
> 
> In article <1083@mhuxt.UUCP> js2j@mhuxt.UUCP (sonntag)  posits
> 
> >     So apparently, either:
> >	a.) Sunny's right, but my mind is too clouded by testosterone to
> >	    realize it.
> >	b.) Sunny is wrong.
> 
> Bad news, Jeff, this kind of binary thinking (excluded muddle, no less)
> is a sure sign of T.P.
> 
> 					nax~paul   cornell!nax

Ain't it wonderful that people can show enough restraint not to
start *that* discussion all over again!
-- 

aMAZon @ AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL; ihnp4!ihuxf!features

edward@ukecc.UUCP (Edward C. Bennett) (08/28/85)

[Like dispersion, spread for the very first time]

In article <3852@cornell.UUCP>, nax@cornell.UUCP writes:
> 
> Bad news, Jeff, this kind of binary thinking (excluded muddle, no less)
> is a sure sign of T.P.
> 
> 					nax~paul   cornell!nax

	Hmmm, binary thinking. Now what do we all use that thinks
in binary? T.P. huh? A male affliction you say?

	Now let's see here..(whir)...1 & 0 = 0.....i++....(bing!)

	Computers are male.


Don't flame me. I just deduce here.

number_of_articles_posted_by_men++;
--
-- 
Edward C. Bennett

UUCP: ihnp4!cbosgd!ukma!ukecc!edward

/* A charter member of the Scooter bunch */