rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) (09/26/85)
> Until you can show me undenialble proof that you and all of us know where we > are going, I will choose to remain in the past, after all, the past worked > and has spoken for itself ... [RAY FRANK] For the uninformed, Ray is a truly ingenious satirist of the highest order. He makes statements like these that a Mack truck could be driven through (the past has worked: fill in your favorite problem that has plagued us throughout the "past"). His best work is found in net.abortion, for those interested. > How about a ban because it is both disgusting and illegal? It would have > to be made illegal on the grounds that it is disgusting. This is Ray on pornography. His brilliance is still astounding to me. I mean, you read this, and the words "why is the fact that you find something disgusting a reason to ban it?" are on the tip of the tongue from the capital "H" straight through to the question mark! THIS is what brilliant satire is all about. -- "iY AHORA, INFORMACION INTERESANTE ACERCA DE... LA LLAMA!" Rich Rosen ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr
ray@rochester.UUCP (Ray Frank) (09/27/85)
> > How about a ban because it is both disgusting and illegal? It would have > > to be made illegal on the grounds that it is disgusting. (ray) > > This is Ray on pornography. His brilliance is still astounding to me. > I mean, you read this, and the words "why is the fact that you find something > disgusting a reason to ban it?" are on the tip of the tongue from the capital > "H" straight through to the question mark! THIS is what brilliant satire is > all about. (richie) > -- By the way, for those of you who are not aware of the censorship that Richie performs on other's postings for the purposes of substantiating his otherwise weak arguments, the above posting of mine dealt entirely on CHILD porn, not porn in general as Richie would have us believe.