todd@scirtp.UUCP (Todd Jones) (10/18/85)
> violent porn is the DOMINANT reason > for some people going out and raping and cutting, or cutting and raping as > the case may be (heard about a weird, grotesque case in W. Germany in which > the order mattered. Write to me for details.). Yup, it ain't like the days of yore before porn was everywhere. Back in them good ol' days women never got raped or abused. Yesiree, everything was hunky dunky dory. Since you think like me, why don't you give these good people the statistics I forgot to bring along. :->. ||||||| || || CENSORED! Todd Jones \ ^ / {decvax,akgua}!mcnc!rti-sel!scirtp!todd | O | |___| SCI Systems Inc. doesn't necessarily agree with Todd.
mce@ucsfcgl.UUCP (Mark McEntee%CGL) (10/21/85)
In article <505@scirtp.UUCP> todd@scirtp.UUCP (Todd Jones) writes (in response to an article of mine, which the first paragraph is a part of): >> violent porn is the DOMINANT reason >> for some people going out and raping and cutting, or cutting and raping as >> the case may be (heard about a weird, grotesque case in W. Germany in which >> the order mattered. Write to me for details.). > >Yup, it ain't like the days of yore before porn was everywhere. >Back in them good ol' days women never got raped or abused. >Yesiree, everything was hunky dunky dory. Since you think like >me, why don't you give these good people the statistics I forgot >to bring along. :->. You buffoon! What I said [in reply to a letter of Alan Rosenthal's] was that he was mistaken in believing that "violent porn is the DOMINANT..." etc. Did you not read the entire article? At least I like your phrase, "hunky dunky dory"...