JAY%USC-ECLC@sri-unix.UUCP (08/17/83)
From: Jay <JAY@USC-ECLC> Parry and Eliza are fairly famous early AI projects. One acts paranoid, another acts like an interested analyst. How about reviving the project and challenging the Turing test? Flamer is born. Flamer would read messages from the net and then reply to the sender/bboard denying all the person said, insulting him, and in general making unsupported statements. I suggest some researchers out there make such a program and put it on the net. The goal would be for the readers of the net try to detect the Flamer, and for Flamer to escape detection. If the Flamer is not discovered, then it could be considered to have passed the Turing test. Flamer has the advantage of being able to take a few days in formulating a reply; it could consult many related online sources, it could request information concerning the subject from experts (human, or otherwise), it could perform statistical analysis of other flames to make appropriate word choices, it could make common errors (gramical, syntactical, or styleistical), and it could perform other complex computations. Perhaps Flamer is already out there, and perhaps this message is generated by such a program. j'
JAY@USC-ECLC@sri-unix.UUCP (08/26/83)
From: Jay <JAY@USC-ECLC> Is this a human response?? j' --------------- Return-path: <flamer%umcp-cs%UMCP-CS@UDel-Relay> Received: from UDEL-RELAY by USC-ECLC; Thu 25 Aug 83 16:20:32-PDT Date: 25 Aug 83 18:31:38 EDT (Thu) From: flamer@ida-no Return-Path: <flamer%umcp-cs%UMCP-CS@UDel-Relay> Subject: Re: Turing Test; Parry, Eliza, and Flamer To: jay@USC-ECLC In-Reply-To: Message of Tue, 16-Aug-83 17:37:00 EDT from JAY%USC-ECLC@sri-unix.UUCP <4325@sri-arpa.UUCP> Via: UMCP-CS; 25 Aug 83 18:55-EDT From: JAY%USC-ECLC@sri-unix.UUCP . . . Flamer would read messages from the net and then reply to the sender/bboard denying all the person said, insulting him, and in general making unsupported statements. . . . Boy! Now that's the dumbest idea I've heard in a long time. Only an idiot such as yourself, who must be totally out of touch with reality, could come up with that. Besides, what would it prove? It's not much of an accomplishment to have a program which is stupider than a human. The point of the Turing test is to demonstrate a program that is as intelligent as a human. If you can't come up with anything better, stay off the net!