DRogers@SUMEX-AIM.ARPA@sri-unix.UUCP (10/12/83)
From: David Rogers <DRogers@SUMEX-AIM.ARPA> I must disagree with Frank Adrian who commented in a previous digest that "I urge everyone to boycott this conference" and other conferences with this requirement. The progress of science should not be halted due to some government ruling, especially since an attempted boycott would have little positive and (probably) much negative effect. Assuming that all of the 'upstanding' scientists participated, is there any reason to think that the government couldn't find less discerning researchers more than happy to accept grant money? Eric (sorry, no last name) is preoccupied with the fact that government 'paid' for the research; aren't "we" the people the real owners, in that case? Or can there be real owners of basic knowledge: as I recall, the patent office has ruled that algorithms are unpatentable and thus inherently public domain. The control of ideas has been an elusive goal for many governments, but even so, it is rare for a government to try to claim ownership of an idea as a justification for restriction; outside of the military domain, this is seems to be a new one... As a scientist, I believe that the world and humanity will gain wisdom and insight though research, and eventually enable us to end war, hunger, ignorance, whatever. Other forces in the world have different, more short-term goals, for our work; this is fine, as long as the long-term reasons for scientific research are not sacrificed. Sure, they 'paid' for the results of our short-term goals, but we should never allow that to blind us to the real reason for working in AI, and *NO-ONE* can own that. So I'll take government money (if they offer me any after this diatribe!) and work on various systems and schemes, but I'll fight any attempt to nullify the long term goals I'm really working for. I feel these new restrictions are detrimental to the long-term goals of scientific search, but currently, I'm going with things here... we're the best in the world (sigh) and I plan on fighting to keep it that way. David Rogers DRogers@SUMEX-AIM.ARPA