Laws@SRI-AI.ARPA (10/19/83)
From: Ken Laws <Laws@SRI-AI.ARPA> I have received copies of two complaints sent to the author of a course announcement that I published. The complaints alleged that the announcement should not have been put out on the net. I have three comments: First, such complaints should come to me, not to the original authors. The author is responsible for the content, but it is my decision whether or not to distribute the material. In this case, I felt that the abstract of a new and unique AI course was of interest to the academic half of the AIList readership. Second, there is a possibility that the complainants received the article in undigested form, and did not know that it was part of an AIList digest. If anyone is currently distributing AIList in this manner, I want to know about it. Undigested material is being posted to net.ai and to some bboards, but it should not be showing up in personal mailboxes. Third, this course announcement was never formally submitted to AIList. I picked the item up from a limited distribution, and failed to add a "reprinted from" or disclaimer line to note that fact. I apologize to Dr. Moore for not getting in touch with him before sending the item out. -- Ken Laws