fc%usc-cse%USC-ECL%MARYLAND@sri-unix.UUCP (12/15/83)
redictions tested with some sort of experiment, the crudity of the statistics is similar to the statistical models of physics used before it was advanced to its current state. Computer science (or whatever you call it) is also a science in the sense that our understanding of computers is based on prediction and experimentation. Anyone that says you don't experiment with a computer hasn't tried it. The big question is whether mathematics is a science. I guess it is, but somehow any system in which you only falsify or verify based on the assumptions you made leaves me a bit concerned. Of course we are context bound in any other science, and can't often see the forest for the trees, but on the other hand, accidental discovery based on experiments with results which are unpredictable under the current theory is not really possible in a purely mathematical system. History is probably not a science in the above sense because, although there are hypotheses with possible falsification, there is little chance of performing an experiment in the past. Archeological findings may be thought of as an experiment of the past, but I think this sort of experiment is of quite a different nature than those that are performed in other areas I call science. Archeology by the way is probably a science in the sense of my definition not because of the ability to test hypotheses about the past through experimental diggings, but because of its constant development and experimental testing of theory in regards to the way nature changes things over time. The ability to determine the type of wood burned in an ancient fire and the year in which it was burned is based on the scientific process that archeologists use. Fred