MCCARTY@RUTGERS.ARPA (03/30/84)
I saw your query in the recent AILIST Digest. Are you familiar with the TAXMAN project at Rutgers? Strictly speaking, this is not a "judicial expert system," since our goal at the present time is not to build a large practical system for use by lawyers. Instead, we are exploring a number of theoretical issues about the representation of legal rules and legal concepts, and the process of legal reasoning and legal argumentation. We believe that this is an essential step for the construction of sophisticated expert systems for lawyers in the future. Some recent references: McCarty, L.T., "Permissions and Obligations," IJCAI-83, pp. 287-294. McCarty, L.T., and Sridharan, N.S., "The Representation of an Evolving System of Legal Concepts: II. Prototypes and Deformations," IJCAI-81, pp. 246-253. McCarty, L.T., and Sridharan, N.S., "A Computational Theory of Legal Argument," Technical Report LRP-TR-13, Laboratory for Computer Science Research, Rutgers University (1982). McCarty, L.T., "Intelligent Legal Information Systems: Problems and Prospects," Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 265-294 (1983). This latter article articulates some of our ideas about practical systems, and discusses several related projects by other researchers. Thorne McCarty